Tonto
Full Member
- Oct 14, 2008
- 110
- 73
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab: XT70, XT17000, Sov XS w/S-1 probe
Tesoro: Lobo ST, Toltec II
Whites 4900, Eagle II SL 90, Spectrum XLT
Falcon MD 20, Whites GMT, TDI Pro, Vibraprobe
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
I'm running pay classified to 1/8" from a bench placer. The gold is fine, but plentiful. As usual, the clay is a problem, so I decided to use a flocculant to help keep the recirculated water as clean as possible. I ran a five gallon bucket without the flocculant, and decided to double check the efficiency of the sluice by making a second run of the same pay. This time I added a flocculant to the water.
Within a few minutes the riffles began to fill with clay the entire length of the sluice. It wouldn't clean out no matter how much water I allowed to run, which would have also washed the fine gold away. The clay just sat there.
The sluice is a clean up type with shallow riffles to begin with, and although I found a few specks of gold, I watched some wash into the tailings bucket at proper water management. I don't think I'll use flocculant anymore, at least not in the mini-clean up sluice.
Anybody else have this issue with flocculants? If flocculant loads up mini-riffles, wouldn't it do the same in a full sized, recirculating sluice?
Within a few minutes the riffles began to fill with clay the entire length of the sluice. It wouldn't clean out no matter how much water I allowed to run, which would have also washed the fine gold away. The clay just sat there.
The sluice is a clean up type with shallow riffles to begin with, and although I found a few specks of gold, I watched some wash into the tailings bucket at proper water management. I don't think I'll use flocculant anymore, at least not in the mini-clean up sluice.
Anybody else have this issue with flocculants? If flocculant loads up mini-riffles, wouldn't it do the same in a full sized, recirculating sluice?
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Upvote
0