flatware timeframe?

gtoast99

Sr. Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
275
Reaction score
572
Golden Thread
2
Location
Virginia
🥇 Banner finds
2
Detector(s) used
Minelab GPX 5000
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Hey all! I have a couple toughies today, but I think they're pretty cool. I found two pieces of broken flatware recently. Both came from the same site, a field where a building used to be, which has produced items from 1800-1930.

I'm trying to get an idea of the general timeframe of each piece based on style, etc.

The first one should be slightly easier, as there's a lot more pattern to go on. It's got a really great stars and flowers design. Looks almost "patriotic" to me. There is a circular "flare out" I guess you can call it in the middle of the handle just before the break. The circle also has a star design on it.

The second is a bit trickier. The handle has a pattern at the very top, but notice how asymmetrical it is. There appear to be three stamps on it, like makers marks perhaps. And oval, a rectangle, and another oval. There seems to be something written in the last oval, though I can't tell what. I can't tell anything in the first oval. The middle rectangle has what looks like, to me at least, a lion figure facing left. If I'm not mistaken that would be the English symbol for sterling, though the flatware is most obviously not.

That's what I've got for you.... any guesses??? :dontknow:
 

Attachments

  • flatware.webp
    flatware.webp
    21.7 KB · Views: 889
  • flatware1.webp
    flatware1.webp
    18.3 KB · Views: 902
  • flatware2.webp
    flatware2.webp
    23.6 KB · Views: 908
The middle mark is an eagle.

Would love to see those cleaned up or photographed closer... I can just barely NOT see what they are.

What are they made of?
 

Upvote 0
Thanks for the help! I'll try to get a better pic, but I don't think I can. Even in person I can just barely not see it, haha. They're either copper or copper-alloy, not sure which. I've heard "middle 1800's" enough on other forums that, barring further evidence, that's what I'm going to go with I think.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom