Finally a Roman coin :thumbsup:

[vince76]

Hi guys.

I got back where i found the Phallus cause i was sure i missed something there.
I love the 75 on my garrett's screen.
I found these coins and three of them where new to me, even without cleaning them.



Then i cleaned them just enough to undestand what they are and....Boooom baby

My first (good looking) Roman coins.
I don't know them at all so i'm waiting for your help.

Here they are

1

2

3

Also the usuale stuff



And how could i miss this beautiful canadian 1989 cent.



Thank you for watching

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[Westfront]

Congrats! With some more careful cleaning more detail will show.

 

[trapperart]

Very nice finds congrats

 

[Loco-Digger]

Congrats on your 1st Roman coin Vince. Glad to see it happen for you.

 

[Mackaydon]

Try:
Constantius II (son of Constantine I) AE3 (348-350) DN CONSTANTIVS P F AVG, diademed, draped & cuiarassed bust right / FEL TEMP REPARATIO, radiate phoenix standing right on rocky mound,
OR
Constans (son of Constantine I) AE3. 348-350. D N CONSTANS P F AVG, Diademed bust right, draped & cuirassed / FEL TEMP REPARATIO, radiate phoenix standing right on rocky mound
Don........................l;

 

[Carolina Tom]

Well done Vince. Those are some beautiful coins! Congrats.

 

[bill from lachine]

Vince,

Good going on the Roman coins.

Regards + HH

Bill

 

[CRUSADER]

Dads thoughts:

From What I can make out they are as follows:

Coin 1 is an Reverse: FEL TEMP REPARATIO– Phoenix onPyre type AD 348-349 Denom: ½ Centionalis
Obverse: Looks like a CONSTANSin which case should be DN CONSTAN – S PF AVG
Reference: Like Sears 18708

Coin 2 is likely one of the VALENTINIAN Familytype and reverse may be a Victory Left SECVRITAS REIPVBLICAE
So age would be Ad 364-378

Coin 3 may be a Countermarked AS. Acountermark of SE is recorded but its meaning is unknown. A countermark of S
was used probably to downgrade an AS to a SEMIS due to loss in weight etc. Interms of Size an AS or
DUPONDISwill be 22-28mm whilst a SESTERTIUS will be 28-32mm although there arelarger too.

There also look like 2 other Roman Coinsin the other set. They seem to be the C3rd Squarish SESTERTIUS types typically
Found for Valerian and Gallienus of AD 253-260. C3rd SESTERTIUS weremanufactured from squarish flans
rather than the C1st & C2nd roundish flan types.
One coin has I think a DV countermark which downgraded a SESTERTIUS to aDUPONDIS and was used in
The MOESIA region up to the C3rdcentury. The other seems to have MLNS but I can find no reference to
such a countermark use.

 

[can]

very nice finds

 

[A2coins]

Thanks for posting Im here in Michigan freezing I have chissled out some coins broke my digging tool I love seing old coins like that I would love just one of those My turn is coming I don't think we have the kind of history you do. I see people post from England same kinds of finds Great stuff I detect through posts like yours until winter goes away

 

[vince76]

Congrats! With some more careful cleaning more detail will show.

Thank s Westfront. I'm afraid to clean them more than this. I better wait any advice on how to clean them.

 

[vince76]

Congrats on your 1st Roman coin Vince. Glad to see it happen for you.

Thank s man [emoji106]

 

[vince76]

Try:
Constantius II (son of Constantine I) AE3 (348-350) DN CONSTANTIVS P F AVG, diademed, draped & cuiarassed bust right / FEL TEMP REPARATIO, radiate phoenix standing right on rocky mound,
OR
Constans (son of Constantine I) AE3. 348-350. D N CONSTANS P F AVG, Diademed bust right, draped & cuirassed / FEL TEMP REPARATIO, radiate phoenix standing right on rocky mound
Don........................l;

Thanks Don.
I think u cant find them in USA but still you know them better than me.

 

[vince76]

Well done Vince. Those are some beautiful coins! Congrats.

Thanks bro!

 

[vince76]

Dads thoughts:

From What I can make out they are as follows:

Coin 1 is an Reverse: FEL TEMP REPARATIO– Phoenix onPyre type AD 348-349 Denom: ½ Centionalis
Obverse: Looks like a CONSTANSin which case should be DN CONSTAN – S PF AVG
Reference: Like Sears 18708

Coin 2 is likely one of the VALENTINIAN Familytype and reverse may be a Victory Left SECVRITAS REIPVBLICAE
So age would be Ad 364-378

Coin 3 may be a Countermarked AS. Acountermark of SE is recorded but its meaning is unknown. A countermark of S
was used probably to downgrade an AS to a SEMIS due to loss in weight etc. Interms of Size an AS or
DUPONDISwill be 22-28mm whilst a SESTERTIUS will be 28-32mm although there arelarger too.

There also look like 2 other Roman Coinsin the other set. They seem to be the C3rd Squarish SESTERTIUS types typically
Found for Valerian and Gallienus of AD 253-260. C3rd SESTERTIUS weremanufactured from squarish flans
rather than the C1st & C2nd roundish flan types.
One coin has I think a DV countermark which downgraded a SESTERTIUS to aDUPONDIS and was used in
The MOESIA region up to the C3rdcentury. The other seems to have MLNS but I can find no reference to
such a countermark use.

Thank s a lot Cru.
It Was easier to find them, even after 1700 years they were lost than understanding them.
I found a better one on int after your description.



For the second I'm a little confused cause the Valentinian coins that i found on internet have a man not a lady!

I worked out the third one. It is a Sesino di Parma, so it is a newer one even it look s like the oldest



I haven't worked out the pile cause they are very damaged but i think they are 1700 stuff.

I have one simple question [emoji12]. Do you think there are more coins there? I have found only tiny coins and as usual near the surface. It looks like no body have been there with a detector. Is it possible that other coins are waiting deeper?

 

[CRUSADER]

Thank s a lot Cru.
It Was easier to find them, even after 1700 years they were lost than understanding them.
I found a better one on int after your description.

View attachment 1271736View attachment 1271737

For the second I'm a little confused cause the Valentinian coins that i found on internet have a man not a lady!

I worked out the third one. It is a Sesino di Parma, so it is a newer one even it look s like the oldest

View attachment 1271738View attachment 1271739

I haven't worked out the pile cause they are very damaged but i think they are 1700 stuff.

I have one simple question [emoji12]. Do you think there are more coins there? I have found only tiny coins and as usual near the surface. It looks like no body have been there with a detector. Is it possible that other coins are waiting deeper?

On the second coin I can see why you're confused. I just cut & pasted dads email. Looking at it myself I can see the reverse is 'Soldier Spearing Fallen Horseman'.


Yes there will be more coins.

 

[Mackaydon]

vince,
Experience has shown that a site never seems to be totally worked out.
Keep hunting, you're bound to find more.
Don.......

 

[vince76]

I will but the problem is my garrett i think. I tried to drop one of the coins in a 10 cm deep hole and the garrett gave me just a very iffy sound!!!

 

[CRUSADER]

I will but the problem is my garrett i think. I tried to drop one of the coins in a 10 cm deep hole and the garrett gave me just a very iffy sound!!!

Yeap, these small coins need a powerful machine.

 

[46Wheat]

Ummm ya what he said . Congratulations on those finds . Crusader I would love to come across the pond and buy you a pint or two and just listen to you talk about ancient coins