Equinox Technologies Part 2
- Thread starter Dan(NM)
- Start date
Echoplex
Sr. Member
- Feb 28, 2015
- 391
- 1,009
- Detector(s) used
- Equinox 800, MXT All Pro
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
My takeaway:
1. Precision target ID.
2. Depth: Multi-Freq > Single Freq. So, as an example, if I am detecting for high conductor (big silver), the article suggests that Multi-Freq will offer better depth over, say, just using 5kHz as a single freq.
3. Greater Stability when using Multi-Freq.
So, while we will obviously have numerous Single-Freq options, the articles suggests Multi-Freq is king in every department. Which makes me wonder -- With the Nox, under what scenario would I benefit from using Single-Freq?
Sound very promising, if you ask me.
Edit: after re-reading, the article is comparing the Nox's Multi-Freq to "Conventional Single-Freq", so perhaps not the Nox's own Single-Freq. Looks like Part 3 will cover this more in depth.
1. Precision target ID.
2. Depth: Multi-Freq > Single Freq. So, as an example, if I am detecting for high conductor (big silver), the article suggests that Multi-Freq will offer better depth over, say, just using 5kHz as a single freq.
3. Greater Stability when using Multi-Freq.
So, while we will obviously have numerous Single-Freq options, the articles suggests Multi-Freq is king in every department. Which makes me wonder -- With the Nox, under what scenario would I benefit from using Single-Freq?
Sound very promising, if you ask me.
Edit: after re-reading, the article is comparing the Nox's Multi-Freq to "Conventional Single-Freq", so perhaps not the Nox's own Single-Freq. Looks like Part 3 will cover this more in depth.
Last edited:
Tis the season to talk up a new machine. I will need to test one out before I buy one. Always do that anymore. Doesn't matter which machine it is.
Top Member Reactions
-
3479 -
2017 -
1949 -
1130 -
1080 -
1007 -
861 -
844 -
843 -
754 -
746 -
675 -
670 -
572 -
497 -
457 -
438 -
421 -
401 -
399
