Equinox 800 VDI compared to EXPLORER SE

[Calabash Digger]

Looking at both machines on deep targets...

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

A History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska - Grab it through Amazon!

[nagant]

I never ran an explorer so no clue. But the recovery speed comparison really surprised me. Seemed a lot more stable on 5. Liked that mount, really cought the VDI and could see you run thru the settings, thanks.

 

[basstrackerman]

I forget to ad on the other forum I really appreciate the shout out. Just want to say I've used the etrac and in clean dirt it was fine but ad in iron or loose dirt like a field and it did not work for me.. your Sandy substrate soil may be the reason some guys are saying the etrac/3030/explorer should be deeper that the nox or deus.. maybe fbs works better in hard packed dirt instead of Sandy soil?? I know I lost alot of depth in plowed fields. But here in Ohio I did better with the f75 than the etrac. The deus then took over as my go to machine. The nox is great but since the x35 coil release and version 5.1 I can't stop using the deus. Great video as usual.

 

[cudamark]

On the Nox 800, I run the recovery speed even lower than that, unless I'm in a trashy area. It makes a big difference on my machine's depth and target I.D. accuracy.

 

[TomNWMI]

I could never see the advantage of using the Explorer in my mild ground over the CZ's or a good single freq machine running at a lower frequency.