Dianne Feinstein: First Amendment Is A Special Privilege

Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
12,824
Reaction score
7,901
Golden Thread
0
Location
New Hampshire
Detector(s) used
Garret Master hunter Cx Plus
Primary Interest:
Other
Dianne Feinstein: First Amendment Is A Special Privilege

September 17th, 2013

(Youtube) – Sociopaths are running the government. Let’s define who qualifies for the special privilege of free speech in the new media shield law.

First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.”

Senator Dianne Feinstein
Phone: (202) 224-3841
Fax: (202) 228-3954

 

Another reason why we need term limits .
This old hag needs to retire.
 

Wrong as usual, 1st Admendment is a RIGHT, serving in congress is a Special Privilege given by the people, it needs to be revoke. I can not believe how many people let her attack our Constitution and think it is okay because she is a liberal Dem....
 

She needs to be sent through a wood chipper.
 

We are in the age were anyone in government can say & do what ever
they want, AND GET AWAY WITH IT !!!!!!
They are not really worried about losing their job. And if they are let go
(so their boss can save face) They will be appointed to a different position
that they have no knowledge about. They never even miss a pay check. !!!!!
 

She needs to be sent through a wood chipper.

She is so rotten the wood chipper wouldn't even bog down...

Sent from my USCC-C6721 using Tapatalk 2
 

What a pompous bit$h!! It's the beginnings of "Controlling freedom of the press"! They will pass laws stating who is or can't be a journalist? Excuse me bit$h but as far as I'm concerned you don't qualify as a law maker. What happened to your lefty support of entrepreneurs? If I'm 17, a high school drop out and only have $5 I can't become a "government-recognized reporter" protected by the 1st Amendment? Paul Revere didn't graduate from high school either so I guess his famous ride would be illegal in the eyes of your government? During this same hearing this ol' hag made a statement to the effect that radio programs may not receive the same protection because they are basically one-sided in their reporting. Talk about one-sided, it's her way or the highway....just like Bloomberg and the rest of the clowns.
 

What a pompous bit$h!! It's the beginnings of "Controlling freedom of the press"! They will pass laws stating who is or can't be a journalist? Excuse me bit$h but as far as I'm concerned you don't qualify as a law maker. What happened to your lefty support of entrepreneurs? If I'm 17, a high school drop out and only have $5 I can't become a "government-recognized reporter" protected by the 1st Amendment? Paul Revere didn't graduate from high school either so I guess his famous ride would be illegal in the eyes of your government? During this same hearing this ol' hag made a statement to the effect that radio programs may not receive the same protection because they are basically one-sided in their reporting. Talk about one-sided, it's her way or the highway....just like Bloomberg and the rest of the clowns.

Excellent points!:thumbup:

Sent from my USCC-C6721 using Tapatalk 2
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom