DHS To Meet With Congressman On Ammo Purchases

Aug 20, 2009
12,824
7,899
New Hampshire
Detector(s) used
Garret Master hunter Cx Plus
Primary Interest:
Other
DHS To Meet With Congressman On Ammo Purchases

Federal agency finally addresses request for answers on bullet buys.

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
April 12, 2013

After weeks of silence, the Department of Homeland Security has finally answered a letter sent by New Jersey Congressman Leonard Lance (R) by agreeing to meet with the lawmaker and explain why the federal agency is purchasing ammunition in huge quantities.

After refusing to respond to 15 members of Congress about the purchase of over 1.6 billion bullets, preferring instead to release glib statements to the media, the DHS has finally been forced to take action.

“A spokesman for Lance’s office said Wednesday DHS has answered a letter Lance sent last month, seeking a congressional briefing on the large ammunition purchases. Lance’s office and DHS are working to schedule a meeting,” reports NJ.com.

Lance initially voiced his concerns about the bullet buys during a Tea Party event on March 15 before following up with a letter five days later addressed to DHS chief Janet Napolitano noting that there was, “growing public concern surrounding the Department’s procurement of ammunition.”

He was then joined by 14 other members of Congress who signed a letter written by Californian representative Doug LaMalfa asking if the purchases were “being conducted in a manner that strategically denies the American people access to ammunition,”

Despite widespread concerns that the bullet buys are part of an arms build up against the American people which also includes the purchase of 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles, the federal agency insists that the ammo is being purchased in bulk to save money and that the bullets are for training purposes only.

That explanation doesn’t wash with people like former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month that hollow point bullets (which make up the majority of the DHS purchases) are not used for training because they are more expensive than standard firing range rounds.

“We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps,” Mason said.

As we have repeatedly emphasized, the argument that the DHS is saving money by buying hollow point rounds doesn’t add up because they cost twice as much as standard full metal jackets.

Last month, a weapons manufacturer who supplies ammunition to the federal government told the nationally syndicated Savage Nation radio show that the ammo purchases were an attempt to “control the amount of market that’s available on the commercial market at any time,” by forcing manufacturers to hold back stock.

The DHS has also purchased thousands of Mine-Resistant Armored Protection (MRAP) vehicles, which according to DHS official Robert Whitaker are to be used in serving “high risk warrants” and are fitted with “gun ports so we can actually shoot from within the vehicle.”
 

metal_detector_vpnavy.gif
Hang onto your underware for the response (if one is ever presented)!
killingme.gif
 

DHS To Meet With Congressman On Ammo Purchases

Federal agency finally addresses request for answers on bullet buys.

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
April 12, 2013

After weeks of silence, the Department of Homeland Security has finally answered a letter sent by New Jersey Congressman Leonard Lance (R) by agreeing to meet with the lawmaker and explain why the federal agency is purchasing ammunition in huge quantities.

After refusing to respond to 15 members of Congress about the purchase of over 1.6 billion bullets, preferring instead to release glib statements to the media, the DHS has finally been forced to take action.

“A spokesman for Lance’s office said Wednesday DHS has answered a letter Lance sent last month, seeking a congressional briefing on the large ammunition purchases. Lance’s office and DHS are working to schedule a meeting,” reports NJ.com.

Lance initially voiced his concerns about the bullet buys during a Tea Party event on March 15 before following up with a letter five days later addressed to DHS chief Janet Napolitano noting that there was, “growing public concern surrounding the Department’s procurement of ammunition.”

He was then joined by 14 other members of Congress who signed a letter written by Californian representative Doug LaMalfa asking if the purchases were “being conducted in a manner that strategically denies the American people access to ammunition,”

Despite widespread concerns that the bullet buys are part of an arms build up against the American people which also includes the purchase of 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles, the federal agency insists that the ammo is being purchased in bulk to save money and that the bullets are for training purposes only.

That explanation doesn’t wash with people like former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month that hollow point bullets (which make up the majority of the DHS purchases) are not used for training because they are more expensive than standard firing range rounds.

“We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps,” Mason said.

As we have repeatedly emphasized, the argument that the DHS is saving money by buying hollow point rounds doesn’t add up because they cost twice as much as standard full metal jackets.

Last month, a weapons manufacturer who supplies ammunition to the federal government told the nationally syndicated Savage Nation radio show that the ammo purchases were an attempt to “control the amount of market that’s available on the commercial market at any time,” by forcing manufacturers to hold back stock.

The DHS has also purchased thousands of Mine-Resistant Armored Protection (MRAP) vehicles, which according to DHS official Robert Whitaker are to be used in serving “high risk warrants” and are fitted with “gun ports so we can actually shoot from within the vehicle.”

"""That explanation doesn’t wash with people like former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month that hollow point bullets (which make up the majority of the DHS purchases) are not used for training because they are more expensive than standard firing range rounds.

“We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps,” Mason said."""

I find this very funny and purposely deceitful. Anyone who knows anything about weapons knows that the military does not and has never used hollow points unlike domestic law enforcement. Hollow points have been banned in war from The Hague convention onward. Domestic law enforcement almost all use hollow points and practice with hollow points.

Why don't we think this was mentioned in the article? Obviously they know this?
 

Wonder how many smoke and mirrors they will bring .

Hope the senator is wearing hip waders and brings a calculator to wade through the bs and keep track of the lies, he is going to need both...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

What is the likelihood that no matter what is said that the conspiracy theories will continue forever. It's now in the realm of 9/11 and the moon landing.
 

They finally got their lies straight. 8-)
 

Wonder how many smoke and mirrors they will bring .

Hope the senator is wearing hip waders and brings a calculator to wade through the bs and keep track of the lies, he is going to need both...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

That's assuming he won't get a close up and personal show of force.
 

Look on the bright side...if you're all right in the end, I'll be here all alone with nobody to annoy! :(
 

"""That explanation doesn’t wash with people like former Marine Richard Mason, who told reporters with WHPTV News in Pennsylvania earlier this month that hollow point bullets (which make up the majority of the DHS purchases) are not used for training because they are more expensive than standard firing range rounds.

“We never trained with hollow points, we didn’t even see hollow points my entire four and a half years in the Marine Corps,” Mason said."""

I find this very funny and purposely deceitful. Anyone who knows anything about weapons knows that the military does not and has never used hollow points unlike domestic law enforcement. Hollow points have been banned in war from The Hague convention onward. Domestic law enforcement almost all use hollow points and practice with hollow points.

Why don't we think this was mentioned in the article? Obviously they know this?

The military uses steel jacketed bullets because they do not mushroom on impact and therefore minimize shock, bleeding and internal damage to those who become wounded in battle. The purpose being to take the enemy out of action and not cause devastating injuries that will lead to unnecessary suffering or death. The intended purpose of hunting type bullets which I believe includes hollow point bullets is to cause extreme shock, knockdown, bleeding and death so that wild game dies quickly and does not suffer. Admittedly hollow point bullets are less likely to ricochet or penetrate walls and therefore prevent unintended injury to the innocent. It is interesting, however, that law enforcement agencies use the ammo that is more likely to maim and kill. I would like to think bullet selection has been given a lot of thought with the goal being to reduce pain and suffering when lethal force must be used by law enforcement to stop or prevent a crime of violence. Whether it has or not, I do not know. When government agencies make large purchase of ammunition and firearms and receive extensive firearm, tactical and civil disturbance training, it understandably gives cause for concern and suspicion that something besides routine training and preparation is occurring. That is why government leaders must be open, transparent and truthful in carrying out their responsibilities and in ensuring that oversight is provided to verify that all actions are legal and in the best interests of the citizens they are entrusted to protect.
 

Last edited:

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top