- Apr 18, 2016
- 5,352
- 11,946
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 2
- Detector(s) used
- XP DEUS II ,XP DEUS, EQUINOX 800, EXCALIBUR II,
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
A valid test between the two. Which unmask better
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well until now the speed wasn't there for the thick iron ...it is now though..
Definitely couldn't touch an At Pro in iron.
Agree 100%, actually it's like tying 4 arms behind it's back....but....my question is more out of curiosity just with flat out separation speed....if nothing else leave the NOX in multi and max out both machines at R8 and R5....in this current test the NOX is running at .875 (7 out of 8) of its recovery speed and the Deus is at .545 (3 out of 5.5) of its Reactivity speed...since the HF coils lowest setting is 18 KHz, a good test target would be a brass button instead of a silver dime.Calabash has proved that one big reason the equinox unmasks well is because of multi frequency....that Is why it generally beats the others out on finding both high and low conductors in trash without changing frequencies. By only using it in single frequency you are literally tying one arm behind it's back so to speak...