Company Threatens To Leave Colorado If Ammo Limit Law Is Passed

Treasure_Hunter

Administrator
⛮ Administrator
⛭ Moderator
🥇 Charter Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
50,307
Reaction score
60,314
Golden Thread
0
Location
Florida
Detector(s) used
Minelab_Equinox_ 800 Minelab_CTX-3030 Minelab_Excal_1000 Minelab_Sovereign_GT Minelab_Safari Minelab_ETrac Whites_Beach_Hunter_ID Fisher_1235_X
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Company Threatens To Leave Colorado If Ammo Limit Law Is Passed

An ammunition magazine from Magpul (credit: CBS)





ERIE, Colo. (CBS4) – A Colorado company is threatening to leave the state if a bill to ban high-capacity ammunition magazines becomes law.
CBS4 Investigator Rick Sallinger toured the company in Erie. They said they would certainly prefer to stay.
The company is called Magpul. Among other products, they make ammunition magazines which can hold up to 30 rounds. Tuesday night a state House committee took the first step towards banning them.


Magpul is one of the largest producers of the high-capacity magazines in the country.
“Actually, every product you see here being made today on these magazine assembly lines would be affected by the bill,” Duane Liptak with Magpul told Sallinger during the tour.
The company’s chief operating officer, Doug Smith, made it clear to the state legislature that if the bill becomes law they will leave Colorado.

“We will be forced to take our operation and business activity through our subcontractors and suppliers out of the state,” Smith told lawmakers.
The bill in its present form would ban magazines carry over 15 rounds. Magpul has those that carry more, as displayed on its website.

(credit: magpul.com)


The company has some 200 workers. It says another 400 suppliers and contractors would be affected by a move. But the committee chairman, Rep. Daniel Kagan, D-Cherry Hills Village, insisted there is no need to move.

“Your understanding of the bill is completely wrong,” Kagan said. “There is no restriction on manufacturing high-capacity magazines or anything else in the state of Colorado.”
Liptak said that’s not accurate.

“It may be not have been what they intended when they drafted the language, however that’s exactly how the bill reads,” Liptak said.
Magpul calls itself a “proud Colorado company,” but says in part for ideological reasons it cannot stay if the state bans one of its major products.



Company Threatens To Leave Colorado If Ammo Limit Law Is Passed « CBS Denver
 

Last edited:
I heard about this almost a week ago before colorado passed the new laws. They said they would leave the state if this happened. I hope they stand by what they said. I have some of there mags and they are high quality.
 

No offense, but if every state passes a law prohibiting a 30 round magazine to the general public, then where does this company move :dontknow: After all, they can still make a 10 round magazine, and how long does it take to change out a clip, 3-5 seconds.. Right? They'll earn a higher profit with people stocking up on several 10 round magazines, then they will on just one 30 round magazine.
 

Every state want pass a 10 bullet limit....
 

How are folks going to be prepared for the zombie apocalypse without their 30 round mags?? No time to swap mags when you are being rushed by hundreds of brain eating zombies!! Sad days!
 

spartacus53 said:
Well then, it looks like they'll relocate to Mexico and sell to the cartels :laughing7:

My guess is that the cartels have prob already gotten plenty.
 

Now you mention it, It is the zombies they need them for......They do act like zombies.
 

No offense, but if every state passes a law prohibiting a 30 round magazine to the general public, then where does this company move :dontknow: After all, they can still make a 10 round magazine, and how long does it take to change out a clip, 3-5 seconds.. Right? They'll earn a higher profit with people stocking up on several 10 round magazines, then they will on just one 30 round magazine.
Spart, you just proved a point. 3-5 seconds (not even for most people) to swap a magazine shows how ridiculous these new "laws" are. If someone wants to be a mass murderer....they will. Bullets, bombs, chemicals, are just a few options available to a potential mass murderer. Just something to think about.
 

How are folks going to be prepared for the zombie apocalypse without their 30 round mags?? No time to swap mags when you are being rushed by hundreds of brain eating zombies!! Sad days!

I assume you are talking about the zombies in congress?
 

Well, let's look at this. If you put the time it takes to reload and add the time to aim again, then multiply that twice for the difference in magazine volume, yo may have added another 15-20 seconds. So with a semi auto, how many rounds can you dispense in that time, and how many additional potential victims :dontknow: That answer may be more surprising than having a 10 shot limit.
 

Spart, I think most mass murderers would have their extra magazines preloaded....I think this is where you were going when you mentioned time to reload. Am I correct?
 

Not every state will pass it, I doubt many will pass it. Good luck enforcing any of it, in very many states more and more sheriff and police departments are lining up with the citizens fighting for our 2nd amendment rights against the lefts continued attacks on our freedoms...
 

Spart, I think most mass murderers would have their extra magazines preloaded....I think this is where you were going when you mentioned time to reload. Am I correct?

That too, in addition to other things. With that aside, let me point out a little something else about this company, one that gives me little respect for them.

By the company's own admission, that magazine is a very important equation to their financial success. It really has nothing to do with their concern over people, or the constitution, but rather the mighty dollar. Think about their employees on the manufacturing lines, all possibly out of work. How many can pull up their roots and god knows where they have to move. You can see how loyal they are to their employees by such a brazen and boisterous statement.
 

That too, in addition to other things. With that aside, let me point out a little something else about this company, one that gives me little respect for them.

By the company's own admission, that magazine is a very important equation to their financial success. It really has nothing to do with their concern over people, or the constitution, but rather the mighty dollar. Think about their employees on the manufacturing lines, all possibly out of work. How many can pull up their roots and god knows where they have to move. You can see how loyal they are to their employees by such a brazen and boisterous statement.

If high capacity magazines are outlawed it would be reasonable to say the manufacture and transport of them would be to. So how could they stay? If they can't build the magazines people will buy they will close anyways. Why would they want to limit what they can manufacture just because of where they are located? So I have to ask how much does the state care about the employees?
 

Oh no.....???
Next forum, *yawn*....
 

Diesel, your argument is flawed in several areas, that I will point out.

1- They can manufacture mags of a legal size with no problem, which they already do
2- Even if the "sale" is banned, the manufacturing is not (Big difference)
3- Transportation of any size is not illegal, it reverts back to "sale" only
4- Your argument about the state caring about the employees is also wrong. It is not the state that is moving the company, rather the company itself. It would appear the company's action would almost boarder extortion.
5- In essence, there is no limit to what they manufacture. only sell.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom