🔎 UNIDENTIFIED Can anyone help on this backmark?

cahills9

Jr. Member
Apr 8, 2022
65
310

Attachments

  • 28A5B806-2D41-4186-BD91-E6EA5F29B734.jpeg
    28A5B806-2D41-4186-BD91-E6EA5F29B734.jpeg
    69.9 KB · Views: 94
  • 982FA723-860E-4C61-9C33-C8EA60FBD166.jpeg
    982FA723-860E-4C61-9C33-C8EA60FBD166.jpeg
    85.8 KB · Views: 59
IMO, Creskol got the country-of-manufacture (the "Lion Passant" in the backmark is a British hallmark) and the date-range exactly right.

Sidenote:
Technically, brass 1-piece flatbuttons with an indented-lettering backmark (like yours) can date as early as about 1810. But the war-of-1812 and postwar boycotting of British-made goods means it's very unlikely that your British-made button arrived in the US before 1820. Therefore, I agree with Creskol's 182030 dating of it.
 

Upvote 3
I've always thought the back of these early 19thc buttons were often so much more decorative then the face. :thumbsup: I attributed this to the button maker 'advertising' to the public of their button-making talent. Also, the gold-gilt often remains because the back of the button didn't receive the same degree of wear to it as the face did.

Nice find,
Dave
 

Last edited:
Upvote 1
IMO, Creskol got the country-of-manufacture (the "Lion Passant" in the backmark is a British hallmark) and the date-range exactly right.

Sidenote:
Technically, brass 1-piece flatbuttons with an indented-lettering backmark (like yours) can date as early as about 1810. But the war-of-1812 and postwar boycotting of British-made goods means it's very unlikely that your British-made button arrived in the US before 1820. Therefore, I agree with Creskol's 182030 dating of it.
That button has some great maker's marks. Very nice 👌

I often wonder about the length of time a piece of clothing lasted back then.
A good wear clothing might be decades.
Even coats/cloaks were costly, taken care of might be around for many years.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top