✅ SOLVED Button with Eagle/Anchor Backmark?

grasshopper

Bronze Member
Aug 13, 2007
1,867
2,857
Upstate NY
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
XP Deus/Deus 2
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
Anyone ever see a backmark like this?

The front is plain.

I've found many buttons with backmarks that include a small eagle. But the back on this one looks like the front of some naval buttons I've seen. Found at late 1700s home site. 20190929_094106.jpg20190929_094233.jpg20190929_094329.jpg
 

Don't know much about buttons, except I like them.
Yours looks like the guy attaching the shank to the button got it on the wrong side...
Great find
 

Upvote 0
Don't know much about buttons, except I like them.
Yours looks like the guy attaching the shank to the button got it on the wrong side...
Great find
I actually thought so at first too. But that is definitely not the case
 

Upvote 0
Most likely the button manufacturer struck too many planchettes with the eagle/anchor die and didn't want to waste them so they were repurposed as civilian buttons. Perhaps they were anticipating an order from the US Navy that never came to fruition. It's interesting that the back mark isn't present on the front. I always assumed the buttons were struck between two dies just like coins which would impress an obverse and reverse simultaneously. This button would suggest that they didn't impress the back mark until the button had been destined for a particular finishing process (i.e. double gilt, treble gilt, silver wash).

By the way, that button is remarkably well preserved. That's a fantastic specimen you have there!
 

Upvote 0
Upvote 0
Most likely the button manufacturer struck too many planchettes with the eagle/anchor die and didn't want to waste them so they were repurposed as civilian buttons. Perhaps they were anticipating an order from the US Navy that never came to fruition. It's interesting that the back mark isn't present on the front. I always assumed the buttons were struck between two dies just like coins which would impress an obverse and reverse simultaneously. This button would suggest that they didn't impress the back mark until the button had been destined for a particular finishing process (i.e. double gilt, treble gilt, silver wash).

By the way, that button is remarkably well preserved. That's a fantastic specimen you have there!

Thanks. It's weird cause the front is beveled so it almost seems like it was intended to be this way from the start. Unless it was re-shaped after the fact.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top