onfire
Silver Member
In the months following the Sandy Hook school massacre, Wisconsin Democrats moved to restrict access to firearms and ammunition.Those efforts included the drafting of a bill in the state Assembly by Reps. Frederick Kessler, Evan Goyke and Mandela Barnes, all Milwaukee Democrats.
Among other things, the bill would restrict sales and possession of hollow-point bullets, a type of ammunition that expands on impact and creates even larger wounds. Authorities said Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook killer, used bullets designed to inflict maximum damage by breaking up in a victimâs body. Kessler argued banning such bullets would give the victims of a mass shooting at least a chance of survival.
But that bill would have a far greater impact, said conservative talk show host Vicki McKenna on Feb. 18, 2013.It would end deer hunting, a key part of the stateâs culture, said McKenna, whose show is aired in Milwaukee, Madison and LaCrosse.
"Democrats in Wisconsin want to fight crime by banning deer hunting," McKenna said.
She explained that the bill "proposed taking hollow-pointed ammunition off the shelves. Which essentially bans deer hunting because you can only use an expanding bullet to deer hunt."
That caught our attention. After all, the state sold more than 614,000 licenses as of the start of the gun deer season in November 2012. Thatâs equivalent to a little more than 10 percent of the stateâs population.
So is McKenna right? Would Kesslerâs bill blow away the gun deer hunt? (Weâll avoid picking nits and assume the bow hunting season would remain.)
We turned to the experts to learn more about bullets and Bambi.The proposed legislation
According to the Legislative Reference Bureau: "This bill prohibits a person, with certain exceptions such as for law enforcement, from selling, transporting, manufacturing, or possessing any hollowpoint bullet, any bullet that expands or flattens easily in the human body, or any bullet with a hard envelope that does not entirely cover the core of the bullet."
That bans a lot of bullets.
But what does this have to do with deer hunting?
We asked Tim Lawhern, the state Department of Natural Resourceâs top official on such matters.
For years, state law required hunters of deer and others species to use hollow-point bullets, said Lawhern, administrator of the DNRâs enforcement and science division.
The law was modified a couple years ago because more and more hunters were hunting with a different sort of ammunition -- often made of solid copper -- that also changed shape on impact, but was not a hollow point.
State law now says itâs illegal to hunt deer with "non-expanding bullets."
Said Lawhern: "It must be the expanding type of ammunition."The idea is that bullets that expand on impact do more damage, cause greater hemorrhaging, and the animal dies in a swifter, more humane manner, Lawhern explained.
So Kessler and company want to ban the very kind of bullets that hunters are required to use.
What ammo would that leave hunters with?
"Nothing," said Lawhern. "Archery. You could use archery equipment."
Banning hollow-point bullets "would have a negative impact on deer hunting," said George Meyer, former DNR secretary and executive director of Wisconsin Wildlife Federation.
"If they donât have any ammunition they could use, it certainly doesnât sound good if youâre a hunter," Lawhern said.Legions of hunters would have the same reaction about an expanding-bullet ban, he added.
"Youâll have the largest army in the world saying, âWhat, are you nuts?â"
A change in plans
Apparently they wonât have to worry.
Shortly after word got out -- including on McKennaâs show -- Kessler admitted he and the other lawmakers had shot themselves in the foot.Theyâre rewriting the bill to "remove any conflicts of law and provide exemptions that honor our stateâs great sporting heritage," Kessler said in a Feb. 19, 2013, statement, a day after McKennaâs show on the subject.
The bill "was never intended to conflict with current laws or codes related to Wisconsinâs rich hunting tradition and those who annually participate in it," Kessler said, adding that the draft bills "contained unintended oversights."
He added: "We will be working with the Legislative Reference Bureau, Legislative Council and the Department of Natural Resources to ensure that any future bill drafts are consistent with current sporting and hunting regulations."
Kessler said in an interview that he still wants to limit sales of hollow-point bullets, but with an exemption for hunters.
Such ammunition would be available "only to people who have licenses to hunt, who are on their way to hunt and itâs hunting season, " Kessler said.
So letâs bag this one.
McKenna said a proposal to restrict sale and possession of hollow-point and flattening or expanding bullets "essentially bans deer hunting."
McKennaâs right on an important front. Deer hunters are required to use bullets that expand on impact -- including hollow points. And Kessler wanted to ban those very bullets. So it would leave gun hunters without bullets.
But sheâs wrong by suggesting that the Democrats were seeking to ban hunting.Kessler admitted hunting never crossed his mind when the bill was drafted in an effort to protect mass shooting victims. The city slickers came up with a bill with a problem that stood out like a white tail between the cross hairs.
As it stood, the law would have banned the bullets. But it didnât ban hunting. We rate McKennaâs statement Mostly True.
Among other things, the bill would restrict sales and possession of hollow-point bullets, a type of ammunition that expands on impact and creates even larger wounds. Authorities said Adam Lanza, the Sandy Hook killer, used bullets designed to inflict maximum damage by breaking up in a victimâs body. Kessler argued banning such bullets would give the victims of a mass shooting at least a chance of survival.
But that bill would have a far greater impact, said conservative talk show host Vicki McKenna on Feb. 18, 2013.It would end deer hunting, a key part of the stateâs culture, said McKenna, whose show is aired in Milwaukee, Madison and LaCrosse.
"Democrats in Wisconsin want to fight crime by banning deer hunting," McKenna said.
She explained that the bill "proposed taking hollow-pointed ammunition off the shelves. Which essentially bans deer hunting because you can only use an expanding bullet to deer hunt."
That caught our attention. After all, the state sold more than 614,000 licenses as of the start of the gun deer season in November 2012. Thatâs equivalent to a little more than 10 percent of the stateâs population.
So is McKenna right? Would Kesslerâs bill blow away the gun deer hunt? (Weâll avoid picking nits and assume the bow hunting season would remain.)
We turned to the experts to learn more about bullets and Bambi.The proposed legislation
According to the Legislative Reference Bureau: "This bill prohibits a person, with certain exceptions such as for law enforcement, from selling, transporting, manufacturing, or possessing any hollowpoint bullet, any bullet that expands or flattens easily in the human body, or any bullet with a hard envelope that does not entirely cover the core of the bullet."
That bans a lot of bullets.
But what does this have to do with deer hunting?
We asked Tim Lawhern, the state Department of Natural Resourceâs top official on such matters.
For years, state law required hunters of deer and others species to use hollow-point bullets, said Lawhern, administrator of the DNRâs enforcement and science division.
The law was modified a couple years ago because more and more hunters were hunting with a different sort of ammunition -- often made of solid copper -- that also changed shape on impact, but was not a hollow point.
State law now says itâs illegal to hunt deer with "non-expanding bullets."
Said Lawhern: "It must be the expanding type of ammunition."The idea is that bullets that expand on impact do more damage, cause greater hemorrhaging, and the animal dies in a swifter, more humane manner, Lawhern explained.
So Kessler and company want to ban the very kind of bullets that hunters are required to use.
What ammo would that leave hunters with?
"Nothing," said Lawhern. "Archery. You could use archery equipment."
Banning hollow-point bullets "would have a negative impact on deer hunting," said George Meyer, former DNR secretary and executive director of Wisconsin Wildlife Federation.
"If they donât have any ammunition they could use, it certainly doesnât sound good if youâre a hunter," Lawhern said.Legions of hunters would have the same reaction about an expanding-bullet ban, he added.
"Youâll have the largest army in the world saying, âWhat, are you nuts?â"
A change in plans
Apparently they wonât have to worry.
Shortly after word got out -- including on McKennaâs show -- Kessler admitted he and the other lawmakers had shot themselves in the foot.Theyâre rewriting the bill to "remove any conflicts of law and provide exemptions that honor our stateâs great sporting heritage," Kessler said in a Feb. 19, 2013, statement, a day after McKennaâs show on the subject.
The bill "was never intended to conflict with current laws or codes related to Wisconsinâs rich hunting tradition and those who annually participate in it," Kessler said, adding that the draft bills "contained unintended oversights."
He added: "We will be working with the Legislative Reference Bureau, Legislative Council and the Department of Natural Resources to ensure that any future bill drafts are consistent with current sporting and hunting regulations."
Kessler said in an interview that he still wants to limit sales of hollow-point bullets, but with an exemption for hunters.
Such ammunition would be available "only to people who have licenses to hunt, who are on their way to hunt and itâs hunting season, " Kessler said.
So letâs bag this one.
McKenna said a proposal to restrict sale and possession of hollow-point and flattening or expanding bullets "essentially bans deer hunting."
McKennaâs right on an important front. Deer hunters are required to use bullets that expand on impact -- including hollow points. And Kessler wanted to ban those very bullets. So it would leave gun hunters without bullets.
But sheâs wrong by suggesting that the Democrats were seeking to ban hunting.Kessler admitted hunting never crossed his mind when the bill was drafted in an effort to protect mass shooting victims. The city slickers came up with a bill with a problem that stood out like a white tail between the cross hairs.
As it stood, the law would have banned the bullets. But it didnât ban hunting. We rate McKennaâs statement Mostly True.
