Buckle

gmanlight

Hero Member
Jun 17, 2007
823
66
MA NH seacoast
Detector(s) used
what ever works

Attachments

  • scan0007.jpg
    scan0007.jpg
    53.9 KB · Views: 280
  • scan0009.jpg
    scan0009.jpg
    62.8 KB · Views: 294
:icon_scratch:Are you sure Pete??I see the pics(great reference by the way!)but I have found these in late 1800-mid 1900 sites.I have zero 1600-1700 history in my sites??
 

Upvote 0
kuger said:
:icon_scratch:Are you sure Pete??I see the pics(great reference by the way!)but I have found these in late 1800-mid 1900 sites.I have zero 1600-1700 history in my sites??
On here now & days i'm never sure. :laughing7: But I'm sure ones I've dug just like it date to that age & are.As nothing 1800's at all came from them sites.Some I think are spur buckles some they consider shoe buckles.
http://www.colchestertreasurehunting.co.uk/B/buckles.htm
Some I've found
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,390586.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,309207.0.html
Take Care,
Pete, :hello:
 

Upvote 0
Timekiller said:
kuger said:
:icon_scratch:Are you sure Pete??I see the pics(great reference by the way!)but I have found these in late 1800-mid 1900 sites.I have zero 1600-1700 history in my sites??
On here now & days i'm never sure. :laughing7: But I'm sure ones I've dug just like it date to that age & are.As nothing 1800's at all came from them sites.Some I think are spur buckles some they consider shoe buckles.
http://www.colchestertreasurehunting.co.uk/B/buckles.htm
Some I've found
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,390586.0.html
http://forum.treasurenet.com/index.php/topic,309207.0.html
Take Care,
Pete, :hello:

LOL!!Your right...just when ya think ya know something!!Thanks bud! :thumbsup:
 

Upvote 0
I'm not so sure its that old, the form is right but just doesn't have the right look/patina/metal type. It also has very crisp casting/edges. Seems to have kept too well in the ground.

Can we have more pictures & info about where/depth & soil conditions etc...


(I just need convincing)
 

Upvote 0
CRUSADER said:
I'm not so sure its that old, the form is right but just doesn't have the right look/patina/metal type. It also has very crisp casting/edges. Seems to have kept too well in the ground.

Can we have more pictures & info about where/depth & soil conditions etc...


(I just need convincing)
:icon_thumleft:

The metal contruction would determin the age, looks like stamped brass..1900s, the earlier one's would have been copper alloy(bronze)

SS
 

Upvote 0
Silver Searcher said:
CRUSADER said:
I'm not so sure its that old, the form is right but just doesn't have the right look/patina/metal type. It also has very crisp casting/edges. Seems to have kept too well in the ground.

Can we have more pictures & info about where/depth & soil conditions etc...


(I just need convincing)
:icon_thumleft:

The metal contruction would determin the age, looks like stamped brass..1900s, the earlier one's would have been copper alloy(bronze)

SS

This is what mine are made of....stamped
 

Upvote 0
Hi all take your best shot , i can take it .
Pic num 2 has the same leaf , both sides as mine .
Its all good
I thought it was mid 1800s
 

Upvote 0
gmanlight said:
Hi all take your best shot , i can take it .
Pic num 2 has the same leaf , both sides as mine .
Its all good
I thought it was mid 1800s
Pop that baby in some hot peroxide & give it a boil.To me it just looks like caked on field dirt covering what we need to see.I did not know they made that type in the 1800's news to me. :icon_scratch: But if you found it were your avatar suggest it would not be no surprise to be that old up that way.All I know to tell ya to do.
Can I see the type made like these from the 1800's somewhere???? Not doubting no one just want to see one so I know how they look.
Thanks!
 

Upvote 0
Timekiller said:
gmanlight said:
Hi all take your best shot , i can take it .
Pic num 2 has the same leaf , both sides as mine .
Its all good
I thought it was mid 1800s
Pop that baby in some hot peroxide & give it a boil.To me it just looks like caked on field dirt covering what we need to see.I did not know they made that type in the 1800's news to me. :icon_scratch: But if you found it were your avatar suggest it would not be no surprise to be that old up that way.All I know to tell ya to do.
Can I see the type made like these from the 1800's somewhere???? Not doubting no one just want to see one so I know how they look.
Thanks!
Pete...give me 24 hrs,I think I know where mine are,but wont be able to get pics up till tomorrow
 

Upvote 0
kuger said:
Timekiller said:
gmanlight said:
Hi all take your best shot , i can take it .
Pic num 2 has the same leaf , both sides as mine .
Its all good
I thought it was mid 1800s
Pop that baby in some hot peroxide & give it a boil.To me it just looks like caked on field dirt covering what we need to see.I did not know they made that type in the 1800's news to me. :icon_scratch: But if you found it were your avatar suggest it would not be no surprise to be that old up that way.All I know to tell ya to do.
Can I see the type made like these from the 1800's somewhere???? Not doubting no one just want to see one so I know how they look.
Thanks!
Pete...give me 24 hrs,I think I know where mine are,but wont be able to get pics up till tomorrow
Thanks man! :thumbsup:
 

Upvote 0
The buckle is 100% dead on early Colonial period. I have dug the exact same style on sites that were pre-Rev War.

This style of cast buckle would usually be consistent with sites that were of the era before flat one-piece buttons, and pre-milled silver coinage. Finds like that often indicate the possibility of cob style coinage nearby. In your area, I would be thinking "Tree" coins! ;D

CC Hunter
 

Upvote 0
Thanks all for the input.
I hear you CC Hunter. This park small and hard hit.
Its nick name [The training field ] for the militia that trained there back in the day.

I think Buckle #2 for Petes picture is a dead ringer Thanks Pete
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top