BLACKBEARDS FLAGSHIP?

imafishingnutt

Bronze Member
Sep 30, 2007
1,675
34
Superior Nebraska
Detector(s) used
Whites XLT, Tesoro, Whites DFX, Nokta Impact Pro, Ace 400.
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?
I thought this was interesting

Searching a Shipwreck for Clues

by Julie Ann Powers

Reprinted from Coastwatch, a bimonthly magazine of North Carolina Sea Grant. For more information, write Coastwatch, NCSU Box 8605, Raleigh, NC 27695-8605, or check the Sea Grant website: http://www.ncsu.edu/seagrant

Whether a submerged shipwreck near Beaufort Inlet was once a vessel commanded by the infamous pirate Blackbeard is still a secret known only to the sea.

But a convincing picture of an 18th century pirate ship has emerged with the gold dust, broken bottles and cannons brought up from the shell-encrusted mound.

And tantalizing historical parallels prompt officials to stop just short of saying for certain the Queen Anne's Revenge has been found. The flagship of Blackbeard's fearsome fleet was last seen sinking in the inlet after running aground in June 1718.

Jeffrey Crow, N. C. Division of Archives and History director, says divers have yet to find definitive evidence - "a smoking blunderbuss" - to prove the ship's identity.

"But we have found plenty of shot to load that blunderbuss," he says.

Lead shot is among hundreds of artifacts brought up in 500 hours of diving last fall. it was the second major effort to map the site and recover items since the wreck was discovered Nov. 21, 1996, in about 20 feet of water.

A few fold flecks, pewter dishes, a syringe, navigational instruments, onion-shaped wine bottles, a clay pipe and barrel hoops are also products of the latest dive. A bronze bell, a brass blunderbuss barrel, cannons and cannon balls, a sounding weight, broken bottles and ballast stones were brought up in previous dives.

Researchers still hope to find indisputable proof the ship is what they think it is - ideally something engraved Queen Anne's Revenge or Concorde - the ship's name before Blackbeard captured it. Or maybe Edward Teach or Thatch, the bewhiskered pirate's aliases. Lacking that, they are analyzing each artifact for dates or characteristics that might tell about the ship that carried them nearly three centuries ago.

The gold dust - weighing less than two paper clips - is a valuable find, though its unlikely to signal a treasure trove awaits underwater. Blackbeard probably loaded his loot onto his other vessels before Queen Anne's Revenge succumbed to the waves.

If chemical analysis reveals where the gold originated, however, it might also tell where the ship put into port. According to a recently rediscovered description of Concorde's capture its officers were robbed of gold dust when Blackbeard's band seized the Caribbean-bound slave vessel in 1717. Concorde was overtaken off the coast of St. Vincent in the eastern Caribbean, as it traveled between Senegal and Martinique.

"We haven't found Blackbeard's treasure by any means," Crow says of the shiny bits. "But it is an important clue to what may have been on this particular ship."

Blackbeard had been a privateer preying on French ships during Queen Anne's War before going into pirating for himself. He renamed his prize Queen Anne's Revenge.

The flagship was among four ships in Blackbeard's force, which at times included 300 or more men. The ruthless brigands attacked mariners from New England to the Caribbean. Blackbeard was killed in a gory battle at Ocracoke a few months after the grounding.

The ballast stones from the wreck, used to keep the ship upright, are less scintillating than gold dust but could prove as important. The rocks are a volcanic variety found in the Caribbean and in France. A Caribbean identity wouldn't add anything conclusive to the story. But if analysis shows minerals unique to Nantes, France, where the Concorde first floated, the ballast could point to Blackbeard.

"If we do identify them as being French in origin, that would be an important clue as well," says Crow.

While awaiting the results of such studies and combing archives for more overlooked records, experts contend everything they know so far supports the theory the wreck is what's left of Queen Anne's Revenge. And nothing contradicts it. All items identified so far predate the 1718 sinking.

The bronze bell, one of the first items brought to the surface, is inscribed with the date 1709, and the name IHS Maria. Historians theorize the foot-tall bell was taken from a captured vessel or a plundered port town. Pewter dishes made by London pewterer George Hammond date to the early 1700s. Two onion-shaped English wine bottles are circa 1714.

"That puts us precisely in the period we'd expect to find Queen Anne's Revenge," Crow says.

A pewter syringe brought up last fall could be the renowned pirates mark. Blackbeard had blockaded Charleston's port for a week before heading up the coast toward Beaufort.

"One of the things he was trying to secure was medical supplies for his crew," Crow says. Some accounts say syphilis was widespread among the men.

A pair of chart dividers, also brought up in 1998, is identical to the navigational tool in use today. Other instruments recovered are not so recognizable.

"We aren't altogether sure what they are," Crow says. "Some probably have to do with navigation." Many items might have been common aboard any ship of the times, Crow cautions.

"We can't say that these were Blackbeard's," Crow says. "But they give us important evidence we hope to develop further."

Historians also are studying what is left underwater and its positioning. The compact debris field indicates the ship sank steadily, as one aground would do, rather than tearing apart in a storm. The smallest of three anchors, set 400 feet south of the site, suggests the long-ago sailors tried to kedge off the sandbar.

The anchors are large enough to eliminate the possibility that the wreck is Adventure, Blackbeard's smaller sloop that sank at the same time, possibly while assisting Queen Anne's Revenge. Adventure has not been found.

Hurricane Bonnie in August 1998 reburied some of the wreck, but it also exposed a 27-by-8-foot section of hull. The timber is perfectly preserved by decades in the sand.

"You can see the grain work. You can see the little wooden pegs," says Mark Wilde-Ramsey of the N. C. Underwater Archeology Unit, who led the 1998 dive project.

The wood could fill in several blanks in the shipwreck's story. It will be analyzed and carbon-dated, and the hull shape will be studied for signs the holds were designed for human cargo. The 90-foot Concorde was built of white oak in about 1713 as a slave ship, records say. The three-masted ship had a carrying capacity of 200 tons, a 25-foot beam and a draft of 12 1/1 feet. As Queen Anne's Revenge, it accommodated 125 to 150 pirates.

Divers have counted 18 cannons so far in the jumbled mass. Their number and varying size are strong testimony the wreck was Blackbeard's flagship. Queen Anne's Revenge was armed with 40 of the big cast-iron guns. Three have been brought up for conservation.

"It seems like anywhere you go out there and dig, you find cannons," says Richard Lawrence, head of the underwater archeology unit. Merchant whips of the period probably carried fewer, smaller cannons, experts say, and a naval vessel's firepower would have been more uniform in size.

Smaller armament also points to pirates. Lead shot, found in large quantities, ranges in caliber from the size of BB to the diameter of a dime.

"These could be used in pistols, muskets, blunderbusses, or even put into bags and fired out of a cannon," Lawrence says. The latter is described as the 18th century version of the Molatov cocktail.

"Pirates were interested in antipersonnel-type weaponry," he says. " They wanted to cause the crew to surrender with as little damage as possible."

The closely guarded site is about a mile from Fort Macon's shoreline and 1,200 yards from what is now the inlet's main channel. Geologists say strong currents and shifting sand have covered and uncovered the upper portion of the wreck many times over the centuries.

Intersal Inc., a Boca Raton, Fla., treasure-hunting company, found the wreck. The Tar Heel coastline is known to have claimed hundreds of ships, and Intersal initially was hunting a gold-laden Spanish packet that sank in 1750.

The company began looking for Queen Anne's Revenge in 1988, after reportedly uncovering an eyewitness account of the sinking in a London archive.

North Carolina law dictates that they wreck belongs to the state. Intersal has formed a nonprofit arm to work with North Carolina. Mike Daniel, who found the wreck and now heads the nonprofit group, says the partnership is unusual in the treasure-hunting industry, but Intersal wants the artifacts kept together. objects from most famous shipwrecks have been split up and sold, he says.

"This is probably the most important shipwreck in the world, in my opinion, because of the history that surrounds it," he says. Intersal hopes to recoup $300,000 in expenses by selling the story of the find and possibly artifact reproductions.

When the discovery was announced in 1997, coastal communities such as Bath, Hatteras village, Beaufort and Ocracoke began feuding over which should get the shipwreck goods as a tourist draw.

State officials say the N. C. Maritime Museum in Beaufort is the most likely repository, but it will be years before any major display is ready. In the meantime, the bell, the blunderbuss barrel and other cleaned artifacts periodically circulate the state in a traveling exhibit.

The majority of the 350 items brought to the surface are under conservation at the underwater archeology lab in Kure Beach and the new Gallants Channel lab in Beaufort, which was remodeled from an abandoned scallop house on property acquired by the Friends of the N. C. Maritime Museum in 1996.

Bringing up the entire wreck, as researchers dream of doing, will cost millions and take at least five years; conservation even longer. If, that is, facilities and funds materialize.

Museum supports want to build a 16,000-square-foot conservation lab in Beaufort, described by the Friends president as a "top-grade" operation.

"We're talking about a multimillion-dollar facility," say Grayden Paul jr.

The 1997 and 1998 dives were paid for with $450,000 in state money and $50,000 in local funds. Officials say the cost of in-kind contributions - state facilities, expertise, vessels and equipment - is impossible to calculate.

The next dive is tentatively scheduled for fall, when water conditions are optimal. Even if the shipwreck turns out to be a vessel less renowned than Queen Anne's Revenge, historians say the find nevertheless adds new chapters to nautical knowledge.

The worldwide attention to the wreck causes some consternation about the glorification of pirates, who were akin to modern-day hijackers and terrorists.

"They certainly weren't admirable people," says Betty Ray McCain, secretary of the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources.

But, she says, elementary school teachers assuage her concerns.

"They tell me, 'We've tried everything on the face of the Earth to get kids interested in history,'" she says. '"And you've finally done it."'
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 975
Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

The Sugar Ship




The Story of Blackbeard Continues off Ocracoke Island

Researchers will resume their search for Blackbeard the Pirate's final prize ship in Ocracoke Inlet on Saturday, May 2, 1998.

Underwater archaeologists with Surface Interval Diving Company (SIDCO), a Beaufort, NC-based firm, will continue searching for the remains of a French merchant ship captured and sunk by Blackbeard and his crew in 1718.

The ship, called the "sugar ship" in reference to the cargo of sugar and cocoa it was carrying, was captured without a fight by Blackbeard, who ignored the terms of the King's pardon he had received only months before. Blackbeard brought the ship to Ocracoke Inlet where its cargo was removed. He then burned the ship to hide the evidence of his crime.

The capture of the sugar ship had far-reaching implications. North Carolina Governor Hyde and some members of his cabinet were accused of collaborating with Blackbeard after they received a share of the ship's cargo. Some contemporary historians now feel Hyde and his contemporaries were unfairly tarnished by the allegations, and were simply following the dictates of maritime salvage laws.

The event was more significant for Blackbeard. Virginia Governor Spotswood saw the brazen act of piracy as a way to finally rid the seas of the shaggy menace to his south. He dispatched Lt. Robert Maynard and a contingent of British troops to capture Blackbeard. Maynard found Blackbeard's ship lying at anchor in Teach,s Hole, one of the pirate,s favorite haunts just off the shore of Ocracoke Island. After a quick but furious battle, Maynard carried the day - and Blackbeard's head - back to Virginia where it was displayed on a spit. SIDCO divers will try to pin-point the location of the wreck through a series of dives beginning in May and continuing throughout the summer. Initial work will focus on underwater obstructions, commonly known as "snags," which have been plotted by local commercial fishermen. Researchers believe one of the snags may be the remains of the sugar ship, believed to be lying under the relatively shallow water of the historic inlet.

Research work, which has been permitted by the NC Department of Cultural Resources, is underway with additional assistance from the National park Service, the Ocracoke Preservation Society, and local merchants on Ocracoke Island.

For additional information about Ocracoke Island, Blackbeard, or the colonial history of Ocracoke and the Outer Banks, contact the Ocracoke Preservation Society.

THIS IS A MAP OF THE WRECK
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    33.8 KB · Views: 661
Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

Blackbeard the Pirate
. . . and the Presumed Wreck of Queen Anne's Revenge.
During The Golden Age of Piracy (1689-1718), numerous rogues pursued their lawless and murderous trade throughout the New World. Restrictive laws passed by the British Parliament had made smuggling acceptable and even desirable in North Carolina and the other American colonies. Preying upon lightly armed merchant ships, the pirates seized their contents and sometimes killed those who resisted. Because of its shallow sounds and inlets, North Carolina's Outer Banks became a haven for many of these outlaws in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

Blackbeard was the most notorious pirate in the history of seafaring. With a beard that almost covered his face, he would strike terror into the hearts of his victims, according to some early accounts, by weaving wicks laced with gunpowder into his hair, and lighting them during battle. A big man, he added to his menacing appearance by wearing a crimson coat, two swords at his waist, and bandoleers stuffed with numerous pistols and knives across his chest.

The sight of Blackbeard was enough to make most of his victims surrender without a fight. If they gave up peacefully, he would usually take their valuables, navigational instruments, weapons, and rum before allowing them to sail away. If they resisted, he would often maroon the crews and burn their ship. Blackbeard worked hard at establishing his devilish image, but there is no archival evidence to indicate that he ever killed anyone who was not trying to kill him.

Blackbeard's lawless career lasted only a few years, but his fearsome reputation has long outlived him. Thought to have been a native of England, he was using the name Edward Teach (or Thatch) when he began his pirating sometime after 1713 as a crewman aboard a Jamaican sloop commanded by the pirate Benjamin Hornigold. In 1716 Hornigold appointed Teach to command a captured vessel. By mid-1717 the two, sailing in concert, were among the most feared pirates of their day.

In November 1717, in the eastern Caribbean, Hornigold and Teach took a 26-gun, richly laden French "guineyman" called the Concorde (research indicated she had originally been built in Great Britain). Hornigold subsequently decided to accept the British Crown's recent offer of a general amnesty and retire as a pirate. Teach rejected a pardon, decided to make the Concorde his flagship, increased her armament to 40 guns, and renamed her Queen Anne's Revenge or (QAR).

Shortly thereafter, the QAR encountered another vessel flying the black flag. She was the ten-gun pirate sloop Revenge from Barbados, commanded by Stede Bonnet, "The Gentleman Pirate." Bonnet had been an educated and wealthy landowner before turning to piracy. After inviting the Revenge to sail along with the QAR, Blackbeard soon realized that Bonnet was a poor leader and an incompetent sailor. He appointed another pirate to command Revenge, and forced Bonnet to become a "guest" aboard QAR, where he remained, a virtual prisoner, until she wrecked six months later.

During the winter of 1717-1718, the QAR and Revenge cruised the Caribbean, taking prizes. Along the way, Blackbeard decided to keep two more smaller captured vessels. When he sailed northward up the American coast in the spring of 1718, he was in command of four vessels and over 300 pirates.

Blackbeard's reign of terror climaxed in a week-long blockade of the port of Charleston, S.C. in late May 1718. One week later, the QAR was lost at Beaufort Inlet. One of the smaller vessels in Blackbeard's flotilla, the ten-gun sloop Adventure, was lost the same day while trying to assist the stranded flagship.

Before leaving Beaufort Inlet, Blackbeard marooned about 25 disgruntled pirates on a deserted sandbar, stripped Bonnet's sloop the Revenge of her provisions, and absconded with much of the accumulated booty aboard another smaller vessel. Bonnet rescued the marooned men and, with them, resumed his lawless ways aboard the Revenge, which he re-named the Royal James.

In October 1718, Bonnet and his crew were captured near present-day Wilmington, North Carolina, and taken to Charleston, where they were tried for piracy. All except four were found guilty. All of the rest except Bonnet were hanged that November 8th. (The record of that trial, published in London in 1719, provided researchers with important clues to the location of the QAR site.) Bonnet escaped briefly, but was recaptured and then hanged on December 10, 1718.

Meanwhile, Blackbeard and his confidants had sailed to Bath, then the capital of North Carolina, where they received pardons from Governor Charles Eden. In November 1718, Governor Alexander Spottswood of Virginia, knowing that Blackbeard and his men had continued taking ships long after the period of amnesty had expired, sent a Royal Navy contingent to North Carolina, where Blackbeard was killed in a bloody battle at Ocracoke Inlet on November 22, 1718. During the action, Blackbeard received a reported five musketball wounds and more than 20 sword lacerations before dying. Blackbeard had captured over 40 ships during his piratical career, and his death virtually represented the end of an era in the history of piracy in the New World.

FACT SHEET
Blackbeard the Pirate

Little is known concerning the origin of Blackbeard the pirate. Documents suggest both Bristol and London in England, the island of Jamaica, and even Philadelphia as his home. He is said to have operated out of Jamaica as a privateer during Queen Anne's War (1702-1713) previous to having been a pirate.

Historical sources vary as to Blackbeard's real name. Though most publications mentioning the pirate by name over the past couple of centuries have identified him as Edward Teach, the majority of primary source documents written during the time of his activities indicate that "Thatch" or some other phonetic derivation (i.e., Thach, Thache, etc.), was actually the name he was going by at the time. The name Drummond is mentioned by one early source, but this is not supported by the vast volume of other documentation.

It appears that Blackbeard began his piratical career under the command of Benjamin Hornigold. Though Hornigold's activities as a pirate can be traced back to as early as 1714, it is not known exactly when Thatch joined his crew. The earliest mention of Blackbeard by name is in the Boston News-Letter in October 1717.

Thatch and Hornigold captured a French slave ship called the Concorde off the island of St. Vincent around November 1717. Hornigold gave Blackbeard the ship and retired from piracy soon after. Thatch strengthened the armament of the vessel, renamed her Queen Anne's Revenge, and for the next seven months used the ship in consort with smaller sloops to harrass shipping throughout the Caribbean and up the eastern seaboard of North America.

It is not currently known how many vessels Blackbeard captured during his exploits, but a preliminary database compiled by museum researchers currently contains over 45 prizes which can be directly attributed to Thatch's activities.

Blackbeard was eventually tracked down to Ocracoke Inlet, North Carolina by the Royal Navy and killed in a brief but bloody battle on November 22, 1718.
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 658
  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 677
Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

Reminds me of something from the Goonies ;D
 

Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

So far theres no proof that the wreck is the QAR.
 

Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

As for one who has had the opportunity to work the Blackbeard wreck, I went into the project as a sceptic. The wreck had to be Blackbeard's shipwreck, to generate all the grant funding...if they went from "Blackbeard's Queen Anne's Revenge" to "an unidentified shipwreck." Goodbye grants, goodbye publicity, goodbye funding. There were several things found early on that DID NOT fit into the puzzle, including a coin that post dated the wreck.

After spending time on the project, I am now convinced it is the QAR. They have done a great deal of research and 99% of the artifacts do lend themselves to the QAR theory. We know what ships sank in that area, and process of elimination, the QAR pretty much is all it can be by process of default.

The material that doesn't fit, is most likely contamination debris from other wrecks. Heck an archaeologist freind of mine that found the U-166 in the Gulf of Mexico, they explored that with ROV and penetrated the wreck and up in one of the companion ways was an aluminum pepsi can, the design on the can dated it to America's Bicentennial as it was a special can made in 1976 and 1977. Somehow, someway, the currents, managed to work that can way up inside the submarine.

Now imagine the QAR, in the Graveyard of the Atlantic and all the contamination debris that has got to litter that site.

Yes it is the QAR in my opinion.

Galleon Hunter




skeptical
 

Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

Regardless of opinions, it can only be called QAR if indisputable evidence proves it. No one denies the Atocha and Margarita have been found.

Problem is no one wants to open a museum called, "Probably the QAR" lol
 

Re: ATOCHA & BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

"No one denies the Atocha and Margarita have been found"

Not quite so fast, there are a few out there. Bob Marx denied it for years. Art Hartman is another that weaves an interesting tale. According to his story the Atocha wrecked in the middle keys, the Spaniards successfully salvaged most of the silver bars and bronze cannons before sand covered the site, meanwhile another Spanish ship wrecked in the Tortugas, a salvage boat was sent there and recovered some of that treasure. The recovered loot from both wrecks was loaded aboard another galleon for the voyage back to Spain. That vessel sank in a hurricane. According to Art, that is what Mel Fisher found. He believes the "Real Atocha" is still out there. Now most of the bars matched up with the manifest, becasue they were bars asalvaged from the Atocha. Other items NOT on the manifest have been disregared as supposed contraband, even though some of the items had Royal Tax stamps, saying the King's Fifth was paid, so then the story of missing manifest pages covered that. Also one of the five survivors of the Atocha, a cabin boy later became a "Salvage master" and applied for a permit to work the Atocha...where??? In the middle Keys!!! Art supposedly has all the documents to back this up, infact the pages were stolen from the archives back in the 60's before they had the security measures in place they do now. I have seen some but not all of these documents. Anyway, makes for an interesting story if nothing else.

I have had enough personal conversations with Dr. Eugene Lyon to personally believe the Atocha has been found...but to refute your statement that "everyone" agrees, is just not true.

it is probably just a case of sour grapes on Marx's and Hartman's part that they didn't find the Atocha. But the discovery of a "real Atocha" would rock the salvage world.

As far as the QAR, archaeologist develope a working hypothesis, such is "This is the QAR." Then try to uncover evidence that either supports or refutes the claim. With enough evidence, the hypothesis can become fact. In my experience you are looking for evidence, to prove or disprove equally. The danger comes when you try to interpret the evidence to fit into some pre-existing model.

Galleon Hunter
 

Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

OK, lol, my bad. I should have said "No one can reasonably deny the Atocha and Margarita have been found"

I'll be more careful. There will always be people who disagree with anything.
 

Re: BLACKBEARD'S FLAGSHIP?

The real Atocha shouldnt be hard to find.just have to look where the fishers havent looked yet.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top