Best one yet for us newbies!

picnic42

Jr. Member
Feb 6, 2010
71
0
Frankfort, Kentucky
Detector(s) used
Whites XLT and Whites V3
This one I actually stepped on... did not see it until I lifted my foot. these points seem to be so close in color to the dirt... at times hard to see!
This is our most complete and "non dinged" artifact we have yet to find! Pretty exciting!
As are most of our finds... they are fairly crude and usually have a high spot on one of the sides.
Any idea on type of material or age and period?
 

Attachments

  • DSC08810.JPG
    DSC08810.JPG
    67.8 KB · Views: 436
  • DSC08811.JPG
    DSC08811.JPG
    67.7 KB · Views: 442
  • DSC08814.JPG
    DSC08814.JPG
    52.4 KB · Views: 438
  • DSC08812.JPG
    DSC08812.JPG
    49.3 KB · Views: 442
Upvote 0
this field Ive been hunting has yeilded some similar to those, the ones I found are called Conerly's (mid Archaic 7500-4500 B.P. they all have a high ridge down the top side. Ill include a few pics...
tree
 

Attachments

  • SNB13811.JPG
    SNB13811.JPG
    147.6 KB · Views: 210
  • SNB10467.JPG
    SNB10467.JPG
    137.9 KB · Views: 200
  • SNB13813.JPG
    SNB13813.JPG
    133.3 KB · Views: 210
  • SNB10585.JPG
    SNB10585.JPG
    194.5 KB · Views: 200
  • SNB13811.JPG
    SNB13811.JPG
    147.6 KB · Views: 202
  • SNB13813.JPG
    SNB13813.JPG
    133.3 KB · Views: 195
  • SNB13583.JPG
    SNB13583.JPG
    133.6 KB · Views: 194
  • SNB10470.JPG
    SNB10470.JPG
    130.5 KB · Views: 206
  • SNB10467.JPG
    SNB10467.JPG
    137.9 KB · Views: 203
Treefrog said:
this field Ive been hunting has yeilded some similar to those, the ones I found are called Conerly's (mid Archaic 7500-4500 B.P. they all have a high ridge down the top side. Ill include a few pics...
tree

Thanks Treefrog... yours indeed looks very similar to ours!!! (also looks similar to the blade we found in the post we did on the same day as this one)
Our area seems to be littered with chips and flakes and discarded chert. We found a couple of small hammer stones and possibly an adz type tool.
Most of the points we are finding seem to be crude and thick but indeed a worked artifact. I was under the impression that the oldest artifacts are the ones that are "finely" made... and the latest artifacts are crude and thicker! :dontknow:
Our assumption with finding most of these crudely worked artifacts meant it was of the latest period therefore around 2,000 years, or under, old.
So your input is wonderful.... and it dates our site at least to mid archaic!
If you go to my previous photos... you will see our dig site.
Thanks for your input... this is one amazing hobby!
Ralph & Peggy
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top