Benzantine era coin 542 ad

Skitz602

Tenderfoot
Jan 13, 2023
6
21
Phoenix
16736738372016589092428888017475.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 16736738698567283111676679609415.jpg
    16736738698567283111676679609415.jpg
    413.7 KB · Views: 41
Upvote 8
Great find !!
The coin, if anthetic, is a 'follis', was minted in Nicomedia (NIK mint mark), an ancient Greek city located in what is now Turkey.
The mint was operational between 498 and 627AD.
Don.....
 

Last edited:
The large "M" design, appearing on the reverse, was introduced by Anastasius in ~ 498AD. It's a Greek letter indicating the value in 'nummi'; M for 40 nummi--a follis coin--versus other letters that would designate other values ('K' for a half follis, I for ten nummi, E for five nummi, etc.)
Don.......
 

The Regnal Year, shown as either a Roman 'XII' or 'XIII' to the right of the 'M', represents the 12th or 13th year of reign; or between 538 and 540AD. To have been minted in 542AD, the coin would show a 'Roman' 15 or 16.
Don....
 

That's a cast copy, it appears to be made of pewter or pot metal and has squared edges with obvious file marks. A genuine Justinian follis with an impressive 40+mm diameter isn't terribly expensive if you're interested in obtaining a real one, the big ones are often from the Cyzicus (KYZ) mint in my observation.
 

I thank all of u for ur detailed opinions and that's all I was looking for whether it was good news or not I appreciate you all taking the time to look at them and giving me the accurate information I have been so desperately trying to aquire. Thank you all again and somebody was asking about a side picture of a coin I'll include it with this reply..again thank u all much respect
 

Attachments

  • 16737283074187418322359420567493.jpg
    16737283074187418322359420567493.jpg
    540.9 KB · Views: 42
  • 1673728485280325878261904122449.jpg
    1673728485280325878261904122449.jpg
    434.7 KB · Views: 38
  • 16737285709933439770004855981622.jpg
    16737285709933439770004855981622.jpg
    657.7 KB · Views: 42
  • 16737286622868287233242946902779.jpg
    16737286622868287233242946902779.jpg
    451.9 KB · Views: 43
Sadly looks like another cast copy.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top