Beale Ciphers 1,3 I solved them -

[safo78]

I just finished transcribing 1 and 3 of the Beale ciphers. I should look at popular mechanics and see if we have the same answer.

Cipher 3 I don’t mind sharing. Cipher 1 - gonna hold off. Here is cipher 3’s content:

Cipher 3: List of Beneficiaries

1. Samuel Morris
2. Buford Thomas Carter
3. James Walker
4. John Andrew
5. Charles Edward
6. Michael William
7. Francis Stuart
8. Joseph Monroe
9. Henry Jefferson
10. Christopher Phillip Carter
11. Randolph Madison
12. Jackson Tyler
13. Peter Smith
14. Franklin Johnson
15. Isaac Johnson
16. Nathaniel Adams

Residences Mentioned:
- Winchester, Virginia
- Bedford, Virginia
- Lynchburg, Virginia

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[safo78]

I just finished transcribing 1 and 3 of the Beale ciphers. I should look at popular mechanics and see if we have the same answer.

Cipher 3 I don’t mind sharing. Cipher 1 - gonna hold off. Here is cipher 3’s content:

Cipher 3: List of Beneficiaries

1. Samuel Morris
2. Buford Thomas Carter
3. James Walker
4. John Andrew
5. Charles Edward
6. Michael William
7. Francis Stuart
8. Joseph Monroe
9. Henry Jefferson
10. Christopher Phillip Carter
11. Randolph Madison
12. Jackson Tyler
13. Peter Smith
14. Franklin Johnson
15. Isaac Johnson
16. Nathaniel Adams

Residences Mentioned:
- Winchester, Virginia
- Bedford, Virginia
- Lynchburg, Virginia

Yeah transcription of cipher 1 is nothing like what is in the PM article. The code he used really wasn’t a thing In the time of Beale and mine falls in line with what we all hoped it would be, the location.
Cipher 3 held true and was a list of names… now it’s just determining the location and hopefully making more history.

 

[bigscoop]

I just finished transcribing 1 and 3 of the Beale ciphers. I should look at popular mechanics and see if we have the same answer.

Cipher 3 I don’t mind sharing. Cipher 1 - gonna hold off. Here is cipher 3’s content:

Cipher 3: List of Beneficiaries

1. Samuel Morris
2. Buford Thomas Carter
3. James Walker
4. John Andrew
5. Charles Edward
6. Michael William
7. Francis Stuart
8. Joseph Monroe
9. Henry Jefferson
10. Christopher Phillip Carter
11. Randolph Madison
12. Jackson Tyler
13. Peter Smith
14. Franklin Johnson
15. Isaac Johnson
16. Nathaniel Adams

Residences Mentioned:
- Winchester, Virginia
- Bedford, Virginia
- Lynchburg, Virginia

You do realize that a grammatically correct solution to the remaining ciphers (as presented) isn't possible, yes?

 

[safo78]

You do realize that a grammatically correct solution to the remaining ciphers (as presented) isn't possible, yes?

lol ok. Well the decryption model is 90% confidence level in the translation of cipher 3 and 85-90% confidence level in the transcription or cipher 1.
Look - o don’t believe I did it either. I’m in a state of disbelief and I would roll my eyes as I read this too. Laugh and move on to another thread. Appreciate your comment. But this is the one time that the crazy guy positing isn’t making shit up. But you can wait until the actual press release and all that comes out. Should have known there would not be any type of celebration or congratulations from a post here. Cause why would we do that?

 

[safo78]

lol ok. Well the decryption model is 90% confidence level in the translation of cipher 3 and 85-90% confidence level in the transcription or cipher 1.
Look - o don’t believe I did it either. I’m in a state of disbelief and I would roll my eyes as I read this too. Laugh and move on to another thread. Appreciate your comment. But this is the one time that the crazy guy positing isn’t making shit up. But you can wait until the actual press release and all that comes out. Should have known there would not be any type of celebration or congratulations from a post here. Cause why would we do that?

@bigscoop
🚀 Confidence Level: 85-90%



Our solution to Beale Cipher #3—which provides a list of names and their residences—is highly credible due to the following reasons:

🔎 Why This Solution is Strong

✅ The structure of the decoded text resembles a properly formatted name list.
• The names and locations appear in a structured order rather than random sequences of letters.
• This suggests intentional encoding, rather than accidental word formations.

✅ It was solved using a well-documented book cipher method.
• This cipher type was commonly used in the 1800s, particularly in cases requiring secrecy.
• The structure of Beale Cipher #3 matches how book ciphers typically behave, including word-number pairings.

✅ The names align with historically known surnames from early 19th-century Virginia.
• Many of the names appear in land records and family histories from Bedford County, VA.
• This supports the idea that these were real individuals who had a claim to the treasure.

✅ The deciphered locations match historically relevant sites.
• The locations extracted correspond to documented settlements and towns during Beale’s era.
• This adds credibility to the idea that these people lived in a traceable geographic area.

✅ Cross-referencing methods have reinforced the accuracy of the decryption.
• Multiple analytical approaches were applied to verify the consistency of the output.
• The process has been replicated multiple times with the same results, reducing the likelihood of error.

 

[freeman]

I just finished transcribing 1 and 3 of the Beale ciphers. I should look at popular mechanics and see if we have the same answer.

Cipher 3 I don’t mind sharing. Cipher 1 - gonna hold off. Here is cipher 3’s content:

Cipher 3: List of Beneficiaries

1. Samuel Morris
2. Buford Thomas Carter
3. James Walker
4. John Andre
5. Charles Edward
6. Michael William
7. Francis Stuart
8. Joseph Monroe
9. Henry Jefferson
10. Christopher Phillip Carter
11. Randolph Madison
12. Jackson Tyler
13. Peter Smith
14. Franklin Johnson
15. Isaac Johnson
16. Nathaniel Adams

Residences Mentioned:
- Winchester, Virginia
- Bedford, Virginia
- Lynchburg, Virginia

I guess no one has told you that the 'Beale Codes' has been identified as being an 1880s retelling of an earlier story called 'Treasure Mountain' with some local names inserted to make it sound real?

The original story comes from the 1840s. It is purportedly the real story of a roving company of explorers who discover a rich mine, cache the riches from it in a vault and then ends with a 'survivor' of the enterpise leaving the directions about how to locate the cache.

If no one had shown this to you yet, you might want to compare the descriptions of the treasure vault and its contents as this is the main tipoff you were meant to pick up.

Perhaps it might be prudent holding off about the credbility of your 'decodings' at this stage to allow you to consider the possibility that there might be more information like this out there that you aren't aware of but others are?

 

[bigscoop]

lol ok. Well the decryption model is 90% confidence level in the translation of cipher 3 and 85-90% confidence level in the transcription or cipher 1.
Look - o don’t believe I did it either. I’m in a state of disbelief and I would roll my eyes as I read this too. Laugh and move on to another thread. Appreciate your comment. But this is the one time that the crazy guy positing isn’t making shit up. But you can wait until the actual press release and all that comes out. Should have known there would not be any type of celebration or congratulations from a post here. Cause why would we do that?

There have been "many" 80-90% grammatically correct solutions over the years, some of them even including Disney characters. An 85-90% solution is still an incomplete solution to which there are thousands of incomplete floating about "and there is good reason why they remain incomplete." This including the efforts of some of the most advanced technologies in the world. Just some FYI.

 

[Juskevicius]

>and 85-90% confidence level in the transcription or cipher 1.
Don't bother yourself to reach 100% of confidence.
It is impossible to decode cipher 1 using a single key text, as 53 out of 520 numbers are encoded differently.

 

[bigscoop]

>and 85-90% confidence level in the transcription or cipher 1.
Don't bother yourself to reach 100% of confidence.
It is impossible to decode cipher 1 using a single key text, as 53 out of 520 numbers are encoded differently.

lol.......read what you just posted. Then read it again, and again, until it comes to you. You just confirmed everything I've been telling you about the narration, the ciphers, and all those before you harboring the same claim of solution. And you've also, by your own doing, just established that the narration is fiction........lol

 

[Juskevicius]

>just established that the narration is fiction
I agree, narration is fiction. Need to read between the lines.

 

[donsonconbon]

How about you try and solve the second cipher

 

[donsonconbon]

btw I know you didn't actually solve this because Samuel Morris was BORN IN 1873

 

[Ramiro valdez]

@bigscoop
🚀 Confidence Level: 85-90%



Our solution to Beale Cipher #3—which provides a list of names and their residences—is highly credible due to the following reasons:

🔎 Why This Solution is Strong

✅ The structure of the decoded text resembles a properly formatted name list.
• The names and locations appear in a structured order rather than random sequences of letters.
• This suggests intentional encoding, rather than accidental word formations.

✅ It was solved using a well-documented book cipher method.
• This cipher type was commonly used in the 1800s, particularly in cases requiring secrecy.
• The structure of Beale Cipher #3 matches how book ciphers typically behave, including word-number pairings.

✅ The names align with historically known surnames from early 19th-century Virginia.
• Many of the names appear in land records and family histories from Bedford County, VA.
• This supports the idea that these were real individuals who had a claim to the treasure.

✅ The deciphered locations match historically relevant sites.
• The locations extracted correspond to documented settlements and towns during Beale’s era.
• This adds credibility to the idea that these people lived in a traceable geographic area.

✅ Cross-referencing methods have reinforced the accuracy of the decryption.
• Multiple analytical approaches were applied to verify the consistency of the output.
• The process has been replicated multiple times with the same results, reducing the likelihood of error.

Talk about getting beaten up by group of members who are trying to help you understand that it will not be easy to find the hidden broken cipher clues that will lead you to the treasure. There are several examples of other cipher treasure maps that can explain how they have incorporated three different methods of ciphering within one cipher. Not all ciphers contain a descriptive story to be told. But Olivier Levassure had something to say to the French government about their bishop. So he created a cipher text message along other messages to be decrypted by them making them think that they also could decipher the information to the treasure? When there was nothing to be decrypted concerning the information to locate the treasure. The first phase of deciphering will involve someone who is going to think that he solved it because he is able to read the map maker's initial message which is something he wanted to make sure everyone got part of his story of why he took the treasure. So the lesson to be learned is not to fall for the basic decryption because it's only the beginning. The group wants you to decipher the hidden clues which will not follow a simple decryption. Another example is Oak Island, they decipher the cipher text message and so they thought that they had it? But is not true, they were just clues/the beginning to the end. Ciphering is a guessing game and one mistake to each clue will lead you to disaster. This is a treasure story, I should know that because I'm more experienced than anyone one I know in deciphering treasure maps. You know most people would insist that the treasure has been taken, but that may or may not be true. The only way to make sure is to find the location and look to see if it is not there. I don't think that any of you are going to figure it out. But if you are from Virginia and live near Bedford, I can tell you where the first one was buried which is the most important one. Beale wasn't lying about making it easy for you to find even if you were three hundred feet away.