Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custers Rifles

lgadbois

Sr. Member
Mar 20, 2003
299
253
Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

After the battle, the soldiers possessions were taken. The rifles, sabers, pistols, and other items of war were collected. They were taken to a place known only to the Indians and buried or cached. According to some experts, none of the weapons have turned up in collections. The 500 model 1873 Springfield carbines assigned to the 7th Cavalry were of a new design. The rifles not assigned to the troups apparently were cached by Reno and Custer prior to the battle. The Springfield 45-70s were issued in 1874, so the soldiers had about two years of experience with them before the battle. Custer had complained to the armory about the new Springfield's length. With a 24" barrel, it was a little too long for a saddle carbine. The subsequent carbines manufactured after the first 500 had the barrels shortened to 22", and also had some other minor changes.

When I visited the battlefield museum in 1997, I asked the curator if any of Custer's carbines were on display. I was informed that none had turned up.

There is a story about a trapper that married an Apache woman. He homesteaded some land near the battlefield. He paid to have a monument erected to commemorate the battle. The monument was constructed with stone and concrete and had a bronze sign on the side. In the late 1940's the National Park Service decided to clean up the monument. The removed the sign to have it cleaned. Under the sign was a glass window. The inside of the monument was hollow, and was construced as a time capsule. The Park Service decided not to disturb the contents, some of which appeared to be small items collected off the bodies of the soldiers. They reinstalled the sign with the intention of waiting till the 100th Anniversary of the battle. The word must have leaked out because the monument was vandalized and the contents were removed by person/persons unknown. It has been suggested that the monument contained information on the location of the burial site of the weapons collected from the dead soldiers by the Indians.

The average soldier carried from 15 to 24 rounds on his person. The troops were using a more powerful and accurate weapon, but they were grossly outnumbered by Indians with repeating Winchesters. It is most likely that the men ran out of ammunition.

Gil Proctor, who passed away in the early 1970s, purchased and was living at the historic Pete Kitchen Ranch just North of Nogales, AZ. Gil had a building built out on the highway and started a small museum. Among the items on display was a rifle given to Pete Kitchen by a U.S. Army soldier that was in the Battle of the Little Big Horn. Gil tells this tale in his book, "The Trails of Pete Kitchen." The soldier was in bad shape when he arrived at the ranch, and Pete gave him hospitality. The soldier was greatfull and gave Pete his rifle. The soldier had deserted and was on his way to Mexico. Pete Kitchen made good use of that rifle during his battles with the Apaches. On one battle, according to the story, he clubbed an Apache over the head with the rifle, and cracked the stock. One day at the museum, a visitor told Gil that Pete Kitchen's rifle was one that was issued to Custer's men, according to serial number.

After Gil passed away, his son came from California to handle the estate. Mrs Proctor was wheelchair bound at the time and required full time care. The museum items were put in storage and the building was leased out to a Mexican restaurant. I do not know if the family ever reopened the museum, or what happened to the items that were in the collection.
 

Last edited:
Re: Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

awesome legend, like to have one of those rifles


lgadbois said:
After the battle, the soldiers possessions were taken. The rifles, sabers, pistols, and other items of war were collected. They were taken to a place known only to the Indians and buried or cached. According to some experts, none of the weapons have turned up in collections. The 500 model 1873 Springfield carbines assigned to the 7th Cavalry were of a new design. The rifles not assigned to the troups apparently were cached by Reno and Custer prior to the battle. The Springfield 45-70s were issued in 1874, so the soldiers had about two years of experience with them before the battle. Custer had complained to the armory about the new Springfield's length. With a 24" barrel, it was a little too long for a saddle carbine. The subsequent carbines manufactured after the first 500 had the barrels shortened to 20", and also had some other minor changes.

When I visited the battlefield museum in 1997, I asked the curator if any of Custer's carbines were on display. I was informed that none had turned up.

There is a story about a trapper that married an Apache woman. He homesteaded some land near the battlefield. He paid to have a monument erected to commemorate the battle. The monument was constructed with stone and concrete and had a bronze sign on the side. In the late 1940's the National Park Service decided to clean up the monument. The removed the sign to have it cleaned. Under the sign was a glass window. The inside of the monument was hollow, and was construced as a time capsule. The Park Service decided not to disturb the contents, some of which appeared to be small items collected off the bodies of the soldiers. They reinstalled the sign with the intention of waiting till the 100th Anniversary of the battle. The word must have leaked out because the monument was vandalized and the contents were removed by person/persons unknown. It has been suggested that the monument contained information on the location of the burial site of the weapons collected from the dead soldiers by the Indians.

The average soldier carried from 15 to 24 rounds on his person. The troops were using a more powerful and accurate weapon, but they were grossly outnumbered by Indians with repeating Winchesters. It is most likely that the men ran out of ammunition.

Gil Proctor, who passed away in the early 1970s, purchased and was living at the historic Pete Kitchen Ranch just North of Nogales, AZ. Gil had a building built out on the highway and started a small museum. Among the items on display was a rifle given to Pete Kitchen by a U.S. Army soldier that was in the Battle of the Little Big Horn. Gil tells this tale in his book, "The Trails of Pete Kitchen." The soldier was in bad shape when he arrived at the ranch, and Pete gave him hospitality. The soldier was greatfull and gave Pete his rifle. The soldier had deserted and was on his way to Mexico. Pete Kitchen made good use of that rifle during his battles with the Apaches. On one battle, according to the story, he clubbed an Apache over the head with the rifle, and cracked the stock. One day at the museum, a visitor told Gil that Pete Kitchen's rifle was one that was issued to Custer's men, according to serial number.

After Gil passed away, his son came from California to handle the estate. Mrs Proctor was wheelchair bound at the time and required full time care. The museum items were put in storage and the building was leased out to a Mexican restaurant. I do not know if the family ever reopened the museum, or what happened to the items that were in the collection.
 

Re: Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

Even though I'm an Aussie not brought up on the Custer legend this is a battle which fascinates me. There is a great book out where archeologists have done a forensic analysis of the battle tracking the locations and calibres of the weapons used with pretty amazing results. From this they could tell where groups fired from, where they fired at, the types of weapons the Indians had and even track the movement of individual weapons around the battlefield.

Regarding the number of rounds carried by the soldiers, the accepted accounts indicate that before the Little Big Horn battle each soldier was issued with 100 rounds of Carbine ammunition (50 in his cartridge belt and 50 in the saddlebag) and after the battle the Indians still found large amounts in the saddlebags.

The Indians weren't all armed with Winchester Repeaters - they believe only 25-30% had them with the rest having Sharps, Spencers, Henrys, muzzleloaders, revolvers, bows, arrows and lances. This does however still represent a projected 207 repeating rifles held by the Indians and this was certainly enough to shock the soldiers and contribute to their defeat..

They were certainly grossly outnumbered. The accepted Indian minimum figure is 1500 and a maximum of 2000. One of Renos men estimated 2-3000, Benteen initially said he faced 1500-1800 then in later years changed this to 8-9000 which certainly help him appear more heroic (in his mind perhaps).

As a result of the archeological survey it is now believed there was little chance that the soldiers ran out of ammunition, nor that their rifles malfunctioned to any great degree (they examined the collected cartridge cases and only a very small amount exhibited pry marks). Essentially the more recent studies have concluded that Custers command disintegrated in the face of nearby warriors of which there was a good number of repeaters. That the warriors fought in close magnified the shock value of them firing repeaters and exacerbated the panic of the troops.

That none of Custers weapons have turned up in collections doesn't neccessarily mean they are still cached somewhere - but wouldn't that be a national find if one of you guys came across even a small cache (definately one for the banner :) ). A good number of the weapons ended up being surrendered back to the government when the tribes surrendered. From a 1879 ordnance report of arms surrendered by the Indians they received:

160 Miscellaneous muzzle-loaders. (Indian trade muskets).
49 Springfield Breechloaders
23 Spencer repeaters
13 Sharps breechloaders
12 Winchester lever actions .44
4 Henry Rifles

They were all generally described to be in poor condition but there is a good chance that some of the Springfields were captured from Custers men at the battle. 125 Revolvers and single-shot pistols were also listed. All but a converted Colt and a single-shot Remington rolling-block were percussion, 72 Colts, 37 Remingtons, 5 Whitneys, 4 Starrs, a Manhattan, a Pettengill, and a Savage.

A truely amazing battle which they are still piecing together over a hundred years later but one which they are now basing on forensics and archeology as opposed to popular accounts and Hollywood.
 

Re: Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

I was told that this is one of the types of guns used in the battle, although most likely this was not one of those actual guns. The part that holds the bullet is made of brass and if fired too often would expand and the shell would not come out - it would jam. I read stories of Custer's men throwing these guns at the Indians in frustration.

PICT0029.JPG

PICT0033.JPG

a couple of more pictures

PICT0035.JPG

PICT0036.JPG
 

Re: Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

This is a topic I am pretty familiar with. My family knew Mr. Fenn, and I have talked with Mr. Kopec a few times.

The guns belonging to the 7th Calvary were mostly 1873 Springfield 45-70 carbines and 1873 Colt .45 revolvers with the 7 1/2 inch barrels. They left their sabers and their Hotchkiss cannons behind at a previous camp in order to increase their speed.

The 7th broke up into 3 groups: Custer attacked the main camp across the Little Big Horn. Reno attacked the flank. Benteen patroled without contact, and then returned to the fall-back site on the hill above the camp and reinforced it.

Custer's command was wiped out, about 200 men. They lost about 50 more men from the other units in the command. Also killed were about 20 scouts who probably had whatever they wanted for weapons. Some officers carried 1876's, or 1873 Winchesters, as well as some pistols from different manufacturers. There was a group of friendly Crow indians who also traveled with them and fought, but mostly melted away when they saw how it was going.

The Indians: the Lakotah Sioux and Cheyanne, as well as several smaller groups had an assortment of weapons, mostly bows, cut-down percussion rifles, or 1866 Wincherster repeating rifles.

Wooden Leg, an Indian who fought against Reno and Custer's detachment picked up a 1873 Springfield, and later surrendered it to soldiers under Crooks' command when they caught up with him. He stated the rifles were more prized than the pistols, because warriors could hunt with them.

During the battle, almost all the dropped weapons were taken away, and a few lost in the grass or the creek. Some revolvers were partially dismantled by the Indians, and after they left, other revolvers and rifles were either destroyed in the field by the soldiers who cleaned up the battle sight, or were returned to Colt and Springfield, with some parts or weapons being later reissued to other units.

Some Indian burials were done immediately after the Battle of the Little Bighorn and the Battle of the Rosebud. This seemed to have been a very touchy area for the Indians, and they generalize their losses, and never gave any location.

There was an immediate dispora of the Indian groups from the battle area following the battle. Several columns of infantry and calvary were all trying to make contact with them. Some Indians were caught and their weapons were surrendered. There may have been some attempts by bands to conceal their part in the battle by immediately discarding the things that they had taken.

Some Indians kept them for a long time, and some were sold or discarded in Canada later before the Indians returned to the United States. Several were dug up in Canada from fields where they had camped, or sold and later found in stores by people who understood where they had come from. Almost all had undergone an attempt to remove the "US" property marking on the frame.

Additional 7th Calvary weapons seem to have been retrieved at Wounded Knee in 1890, where the 7th Calvary shot their Hotchkiss guns at a camp full of Lakotah Sioux and killed about 300 of them. A number of Indian weapons were taken also, and many were destroyed at a nearby reservation post following the argument that turned into a general massacre.

There are some well known examples of the pistols that have been found and sold, and some suspected serial range rifles that show Indian use, or were donated or sold by Indians who had gotten them from an older relative who took part in the battle. I have looked at and held a few of the pistols in the number range.
 

Re: Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

I did a little more research on the treasure cache from the Custer massacre.

According to William C. Slaper, the soldier's bodies at the scene of the battle were all stripped naked. The clothing and valuables had been taken. Later, and Indian named Spotted Hawk told of the looting: "After the fighting was over, the women and children went up to the battleground. There, as usual, there was mutilation of the dead. I was then seven years old. I went with a group of children a little older than me, and we began to take from the slain whatever we wished. Among other things, we tried to take off the clothing, cutting loose the waistbands of the soldiers to remove their trousers. While engaged in this process, one child happened to rip up a waistband and noticed pieces of green paper, some small and some large. And looking further found that almost every man's waistband contained some. We did not know what it was, but since it had been hidden by the men we thought it must be precious, so we took it all back to camp." What the tribal elders did with the money, Spotted Hawk did not know.

Some years later a Billings, MT newspaper reporter found out that a stone monument had been erected on a bluff near the settlement of Busby. An inscription on the monument read: "Here lies the remains of Two Moon, Chief of the Cheyenne Indians, who led his men against Gen. Custer in the battle of the Little Big Horn, June 25, 1876. Erected by W.P. Moncure, Indian Trader.

Who was W.P. Moncure? Land records recorded a deed transfer of the land from S.L. Busby to W.P. Moncure. In 1941, Moncure had deeded the land to the U.S. Government. It was discovered the the plaque on the monument was actually a door which could be moved aside to view a glass window. The cavity behind contained a U.S. Cavalry carbine, various Indian relics, a large photograph of Two Moon, and a large manila envelope. On the envelope could be seen the following: June 25, 1936. Why I erected the Two Moons monument. My connection with Montana pioneers Broadwater, Granville, Stewart, W.G. Conrad, and others. Busby, Montana where Gen. Custer spent his last night on earth. History and location of Starved To Death Rock, Boseman Expedition 1874 up Rosebud Creek. Two soldiers got away from Custer's battle alive. History Indian fort up Busby Creek. Hiding place and location of money and items taken from dead soldiers on Custer battlefield. To be opened June 25, 1986. Signed: W.P. Moncure, Busby, Montana. June 25, 1936.

The reporter met Moncure personally in 1955. He was about 80 years old. Moncure talked freely about the monument, and said that all would be revealed when the vault was opened in 1986. In October of 1960, someone broke open the monument and stole the manila envelope. On February, 1961, Moncure wrote to the officials at the Bureau of Indian Affairs telling them that the envelope had indeed told of the burial site of the Custer massacre money. This information he said came from a man named Willis Rowland who was now dead. There was only one other person that knew where the money was buried, a George Osten of Billings, Montana.

It is unknown what other items were buried with the money. It has been assumed that other personal items that were taken off the bodies may also be buried with the money.
 

Re: Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

The Reporter for the Billings Gazette was a woman named Kathryn Wright. She is a writer of Montana history and wrote for magazines as well. There is some suspicion that she was the one that decided to remove the manila folder from the monument.

It is unknown to the public if the cache was ever located, but the location of the cache has been given as a cairn located on the hill above Two Moon's grave.

As far as the 1873 Springfields that were issued to Custer, history is all over the map in describing these weapons. Many firearm experts disagree on the serial numbers of these carbines. Some claim that the serial number range is in the 30,000 or 40,000 range. My research indicates that the carbines issued to the 7th Cavalry were a new sample lot of 500 that were numbered from 1 to 500. This would agree with the serial on the Springfield 45-70 that was obtained by Pete Kitchen. It has a serial number of 388. I have seen this rifle, and that is the serial number. It is possible that some of Custer's men were still using the older Springfield Allin .50 rifles, and the 32" 1873 45-70 Springfields were of a different serial number range.

The story that Gil Proctor tells in his book relates that Pete Kitchen got the carbine from an employee. The employee picked up the U.S. Army soldier on the Tucson-Nogales road in his wagon. The wagon driver apparently felt threatened and shot the soldier to death. He took the carbine and a sack of personal belongings, and left the soldier along the side of the road. The sack contained a box with about $14,000 in money. (Was this Custer's Paymaster? The Army had just issued three months pay for the men before they left the post.) The wagon driver buried the box near Nogales at the corner of a corral. When he came back to get it he found that a family that had camped on the site had found and taken the box with the money.
 

Re: Battle of the Little Big Horn - Custer's Rifles

Many great stories. Best of luck to all of you.
 

interesting story . I am of the belief no sabres were carried by the 7th on that campaign or battle. It also was reported by indians of the battle that the soldiers disregarded their rifles quickly as the fighting became very close so the soldiers started using their pistols. You may be right about ammunition and also the Indian women scared of the majority of horses so the extra ammunition each soldier carried would have been lost. I also believe Custer was using his personal hunting rifle with octagonal barrel and it was never found.
 

I was told that this is one of the types of guns used in the battle, although most likely this was not one of those actual guns. The part that holds the bullet is made of brass and if fired too often would expand and the shell would not come out - it would jam. I read stories of Custer's men throwing these guns at the Indians in frustration.

View attachment 278078

View attachment 278079

a couple of more pictures

View attachment 278080

View attachment 278081

No US troops were issued Winchester repeating rifles like the one you picture. Custer's troops were armed with 45-70 Sringfield "trapdoor" rifles as were all US troops of that era. The trapdoors did have a tendency to jam when overheated from rapid firing but they had no brass parts. The trapdoor was also a single-shot firearm, not a repeater, the US government did not like repeaters and after the civil war where a small amount of Spencer and Henry repeaters were issued the government only issued single shot rifles for the next forty or so years. Anybody who thinks the US cavalry used Winchester repeaters has watched too many movies that were made with no authenticity in their selection of guns for the movie.
 

Last edited:
Sounds like the OP has been reading too many "treasure" magazines. There are no old stories of Indians stashing rifles. They would have needed all firearms captured for use, the idea of making a cache of them is totally preposterous.
 

No US troops were issued Winchester repeating rifles like the one you picture. Custer's troops were armed with 45-70 Sringfield "trapdoor" rifles as were all US troops of that era. The trapdoors did have a tendency to jam when overheated from rapid firing but they had no brass parts. The trapdoor was also a single-shot firearm, not a repeater, the US government did not like repeaters and after the civil war where a small amount of Spencer and Henry repeaters were issued the government only issued single shot rifles for the next forty or so years. Anybody who thinks the US cavalry used Winchester repeaters has watched too many movies that were made with no authenticity in their selection of guns for the movie.

Correct...
 

Custer was carrying crates of spare rifles that slowed him down so he stopped in the Black Hills area and buried them as an old tail goes. I did a little looking in this area, but it is a national park area and extreme rough so I quit the search.That was many years ago. Frank
 

One of Custer's Rifles

This rifle was in possession of Gil Proctor, owner of the Pete Kitchen Ranch in Nogales, AZ. It is one of the new rifles, serial numbers 1 through 500 that were assigned to Custer just before his demise at the Battle of Little Big Horn.
 

Attachments

  • custer001.bmp
    504 KB · Views: 497
The Sringfield trapdoor rifles used by Custer's men were NOT, I repeat NOT serial numbered 1 through 500.
 

The Sringfield trapdoor rifles used by Custer's men were NOT, I repeat NOT serial numbered 1 through 500.

You are incorrect in your statement. There are many collectors that have tried to validate the value of their Springfield Carbines by claiming that theirs is a Custer weapon. It is a matter of historical record that the first Springfield 1873 Trapdoor Carbines, serial numbers 1-500 were issued to Custer's men in 1874. As they did not need the entire allotment, over 200 of the new weapons were cached prior to the attack. The first model had a 32" barrel and no sling mount. The sling was added for use by the U.S. infantry. The 32" barrel was too long for saddle use, and the barrel was shortened to 22" on later production. The serial number range of 30,000-40,000 was produced about 1876. Most had a 22" barrel and a sling mount.

It is also thought that all of Custer's Springfields were recovered from the Indians. This again is not true. Most of the rifles taken from the Indians were lever action repeaters. Very few of the 1873 serial number group have ever turned up.

The 1873 Springfield Carbine was a single shot design that was already obsolete. It was a redesign of the model 1866 Allin Rifle that was standard Infantry issue. It was accurate to 300 yards, but the reliability was poor due to the use of copper jackets rounds that would jam the mechanism. Cartridges were available in 55 and 70 grain loads. Some historians have suggested that the 70 grain cartridges were at fault in causing the jamming.

Where is the serial number 388 now? After Gil Proctor died, his son closed the museum, and the building became a Mexican restaurant. Only the family would know what happened to this historic firearm. It was over 40 years ago when I was there and saw it.
 

Last edited:
One of the things I have failed to mention: Reno and Benteen detachments were not armed with the earlier serial number weapons. Yes, they were a part of the Battle of Little Bighorn, but did not receive the first allotment of the 1873 Springfields. A known and documented carbine from the battle with the shorter barrel had a serial number from the summer of 1874.
 

I was told that this is one of the types of guns used in the battle, although most likely this was not one of those actual guns. The part that holds the bullet is made of brass and if fired too often would expand and the shell would not come out - it would jam. I read stories of Custer's men throwing these guns at the Indians in frustration.

View attachment 278078




View attachment 278079

a couple of more pictures

View attachment 278080

View attachment 278081

That is a later 1st model 1873 winchester.......the cocking lever and the pin above the trigger indicates that it was made after 1876......probably 1879.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top