JJames
Greenie
- May 10, 2016
- 15
- 9
- Detector(s) used
- White's, Garrett, Fisher, Minelab, etc.
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
Does anyone know what this symbol means? It's carved on a rock.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure how to put pics on here. The j starts on top of a rock about 4 inches thick. The j ends underneath the rock. Beside it is 3 slash marks. Those marks are about 2 inches long, maybe. It's a small mark.
Does anyone know what this symbol means? It's carved on a rock.
It's not associated with a ranch, it's Jesse James stuff. I already know that. Just asking a general question. Does anybody know the general meaning of a carved backwards J in association with k g c? Thanks
Does anyone know what this symbol means? It's carved on a rock.
It's not associated with a ranch, it's Jesse James stuff. I already know that.
Thanks alot for the information. Don't have a computer at my house. I live in the way out country away from any connections. But I do appreciate it, thanks
A reversed "J" doesn't mean anything other then what you want it to mean. We still haven't seen a picture of it to determine if it's man made, but for the sake of argument, lets say it is a man carved reverse looking "J". It could be an inversed initial J (not so uncommon at the time when signing an X for your signature was common), it could be the code of your rock shelter club house, it could be the initial of your girlfriend, it could be an Indian carving of water flow, it could be whatever the carver intended it to mean, nothing more, nothing less. No documented, legitimate treasure in the recorded history of man has ever been found through a reverse "J", so attributing it to treasure at this point is the least likely of all its possible meanings.
Can you post a picture of it?
You must be a very negative person. Glad I’m not around you in real life
That doesn't sound negative to me. All GoDeep is saying is that there is insufficient evidence at this point to draw conclusions. And when it comes to treasure hunting, it makes sense to me that one should invest significant energy into a lot of research before stabbing a shovel into the soil. Imagine how many holes could be dug or time and energy spent if people saw clues in every odd mark. You only have so much time and energy in this life, and you have to make it count. Taking the time to analyze these oddities and apply some scientific reasoning and logic to the process will serve us well in these endeavors. If I were to speculate--and I will, most of the caches that have been found in the United States have been stumbled on by people who weren't looking for them. And most of those caches, while interesting and thrilling to the finder, didn't make them rich. One of the reasons I don't spend a lot of time metal detecting is that the operating axiom is, "Dig everything!". I've seen too many pull tabs, bottle caps and rusty nails come up out of the ground after 10 minutes of digging to invest a lot of time in in unless I have a pretty good reason to dig. Granted, if I was out in the middle of nowhere and there are no signs of human activity I would be more prone to dig everything. But in old neighborhoods or around buildings I would take the time to research where likely caches would be buried, i.e. near big trees or other landmarks that the person who buried the cache would be likely to use to find a cache they buried many years before.
That doesn't sound negative to me. All GoDeep is saying is that there is insufficient evidence at this point to draw conclusions. And when it comes to treasure hunting, it makes sense to me that one should invest significant energy into a lot of research before stabbing a shovel into the soil. Imagine how many holes could be dug or time and energy spent if people saw clues in every odd mark. You only have so much time and energy in this life, and you have to make it count. Taking the time to analyze these oddities and apply some scientific reasoning and logic to the process will serve us well in these endeavors. If I were to speculate--and I will, most of the caches that have been found in the United States have been stumbled on by people who weren't looking for them. And most of those caches, while interesting and thrilling to the finder, didn't make them rich. One of the reasons I don't spend a lot of time metal detecting is that the operating axiom is, "Dig everything!". I've seen too many pull tabs, bottle caps and rusty nails come up out of the ground after 10 minutes of digging to invest a lot of time in in unless I have a pretty good reason to dig. Granted, if I was out in the middle of nowhere and there are no signs of human activity I would be more prone to dig everything. But in old neighborhoods or around buildings I would take the time to research where likely caches would be buried, i.e. near big trees or other landmarks that the person who buried the cache would be likely to use to find a cache they buried many years before.
You’re better off looking for a treasure that has been marked.
Metal detecting IMO is nothing but a waste of time
Exactly my point and it's refreshing to see some get it. My point is to actually help by following the facts of the evidence. At this point, all we really know, is that there was a backwards "J", that the OP originally said he didn't know what it means and asked for our help. To actually help, one needs to critically examine the evidence. Let's break it down by examining the evidence critically; it's what every legitimate scientist, archeologist, law enforcement officer and treasure hunter does and it's why they have success in solving mysteries. What I see time and time again is putting the horse before the cart: a declaration that there must be treasure nearby and then trying to make every stump, scratch, rock, whisper, etc. point to that "treasure". You need to let the facts lead the investigation, not make the facts fit the desired narrative.