Any ideas on this wrench?

[HAPPYCAMPER]

Buddy dug this up yesterday in area that dates to mid 1800s,though this was found along edge of the old dirt road so no idea what time frame its from or use actually.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[mojjax]

[h=2]INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER tractor wrench [/h]

 

[HAPPYCAMPER]

Any idea on time frame or is it a tool that was used over many years? Either way a pretty dang fast reply

[h=2]INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER tractor wrench [/h]

 

[Charlie P. (NY)]

Mojjax is correct. ZA810 IH Wrench (#294 below). 1902 to 1985; closer to the former, but there was a Z810 model earlier so . . . 1930 ish(?)


View attachment 1206524

 

[HAPPYCAMPER]

Thank you Charlie for info...was wondering though what is piece thats 90 degrees from wrench opening for..? seems quite odd.

Mojjax is correct. ZA810 IH Wrench (#294 below). 1902 to 1985; closer to the former, but there was a Z810 model earlier so . . . 1930 ish(?)


View attachment 1206524
View attachment 1206525
View attachment 1206526

 

[Charlie P. (NY)]

Don't know. Pin puller or spring compresser? Never owned an International Harvester.

 

[Nitric]

Thank you Charlie for info...was wondering though what is piece thats 90 degrees from wrench opening for..? seems quite odd.

This one says implement wrench..

Antique Farm Wagon Tractor Implement Wrench Ih International Harvester Z810

Maybe for mower deck,plow,etc.... Can't find something that describes use of the fork(?).

I have one from the 30's with manuals.....but im not much help since it's 3 states away. I don't even know model yet. All I know is, I don't have the guts to crank start it. I like my fingers and arms.

 

[nhbenz]

Pitman wrench? How pitman wrenches work

 

[G.I.B.]

Nice solve Mojjax,


I wonder why people keep guessing once it's been properly solved?

Further review

 

[nhbenz]

Nice solve Mojjax,


I wonder why people keep guessing once it's been properly solved?

Further review

I wonder why you think it was solved when the follow-up question has not definitively been answered? Please try to read all relevant information before insulting the intent of others.