Another Holsten River find… celt

digi-shots

Jr. Member
Aug 6, 2022
63
85
Virginia

Attachments

  • 6C240F0D-2789-49A6-8FD0-F54C9A442A94.jpeg
    6C240F0D-2789-49A6-8FD0-F54C9A442A94.jpeg
    932.2 KB · Views: 41
  • BEFC920B-1F87-49D3-B1C8-BB7B5A008DE5.jpeg
    BEFC920B-1F87-49D3-B1C8-BB7B5A008DE5.jpeg
    591.1 KB · Views: 41
  • 724C1714-BD34-46C1-81EB-84E6CF3EAA26.jpeg
    724C1714-BD34-46C1-81EB-84E6CF3EAA26.jpeg
    980.9 KB · Views: 36
  • 9B8E8E17-DF08-4409-B86B-C7BCA0D3519B.jpeg
    9B8E8E17-DF08-4409-B86B-C7BCA0D3519B.jpeg
    951.2 KB · Views: 43
Upvote 8
I understand celts to have succeeded grooved axes so post archaic, but not a hard and fast rule. In my area in N. Ohio, we can generally separate late woodland from early and middle woodland in that late woodland tend to have only the bits finished and polished. Unfortunately I have no pics handy
 

From Lar Hothems book, "Indian Axes & Related Stone Artifacts" this celt would be classified as an Adena round polled celt, an early Woodland form. The tapered celt in cross section has a rounded or oval configuration.

The celt is the axe form from sometime before 1000 BC until widespread contact with Europeans, averaged at ca. AD 1650. This includes all of the Woodland period (1000 BC - AD 1000) and the Mississippian period ( AD 800 - 1500).
Page 94-95
celts.jpg
 

Trying not to let it bother me because I think you are right about the form being woodland but it is bugging me… celts aren’t strictly woodland if you want to be technical, but being practical, woodland is a safe assumption for most celts
F497F555-CC4C-4879-963E-B9406A619C83.jpeg

FB62220F-BE98-4D07-BA1A-C8D06A128081.jpeg

64F8C85A-3AC2-45A1-9CFB-45CDAD8DAB47.jpeg
C478893A-F9C3-416F-9711-919F5E4A1121.jpeg
 

I really appreciate all the replies. It makes it a lot easier to understand the shapes and variations when others comment and share their knowledge.

I have a few other celts that I’ll post in a new thread.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top