A unique approach to excavating a shipwreck

mad4wrecks

Bronze Member
Dec 20, 2004
2,263
109
Detector(s) used
Aquapulse, DetectorPro Headhunter, Fisher F75
Primary Interest:
Shipwrecks
Shipwreck salvage company destroys coral reef off Rota
by MONETH G. DEPOSA

SAIPAN, CNMI (10 Nov 2006) -- IOTA Partners, which is conducting excavation work in connection with the Spanish galleon Santa Margarita off Rota, has been told to desist from violating environmental laws of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and to mitigate damage caused by its actions.

An administrative order issued to the company stated that certain IOTA actions violated the Coastal Resource Management permit conditions, the Division of Environmental Quality's water quality standards, and the Division of Fish and Wildlife's regulations.

According to Reina Camacho, Department of Environmental Quality spokeswoman, the Seattle-based company violated Coastal Resource Management regulations when it laid concrete slabs on the reef flat and deployed a tracked excavator directly on the reef without a permit.

It also failed to submit a cleanup plan as ordered by Coastal Resource Management.

"IOTA disturbed living coral and disrupted fish habitat when it installed 78 one-ton concrete blocks on the coral reef, violating the Fish, Game, and Endangered Species Act," Camacho said in a statement, adding that further damage was caused to the coral reef when IOTA employees drove the 51-ton excavator with metal treads directly over the reef.
She said the improper use of the excavator also resulted in the discharge of debris on the reef, thereby affecting water quality on the reef and violating the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Water Quality Standards, as well as the Environmental Protection Act.

According to Frank M. Rabauliman, Department of Environmental Quality director, the agency sent a notice of violation to IOTA on Sept. 1, 2001.

IOTA was told to mitigate the harm to the aquatic environment and avoid future violations by complying with the Coastal Resource Management enforcement notice and instructions from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and to take corrective measures regarding the infractions and damage to the reef flat.

IOTA was told to survey the damage to the reef flat with an independent survey team.

IOTA was required to disclose its plans to repair or mitigate the damage identified by the survey, which is subject to approval from local natural resources agencies.


IOTA Partners has been allowed by the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to salvage the wreck after finding the ship's anchor and artifacts. The proceeds of any sale of recovered artifacts will be shared with the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, which will get a quarter of the total amount.

Moreover, IOTA must estimate the reasonable value of any damage that cannot be substantially rectified.

"Failure to complete the steps as specified will result in penalties as set forth by the law for each violation dating back to the day of the receipt of the order," Department of Environmental Quality stated.

"Coastal Resource Management, Department of Environmental Quality and Department of Fish and Wildlife expect IOTA to cooperate fully and to comply with the (law)," Camacho said in a statement.

Since 1995, IOTA has spent millions of dollars in searching the remains of the 1601 trade galleon Sta. Margarita, which sunk in strong currents outside the reef off the isle of Rota's Teteto village.

Bound for Acapulco, and loaded with gold, spices, porcelain, textiles and Asian-made items, the ship sailed from Manila in July 1600.

IOTA Partners has been allowed by the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands to salvage the wreck after finding the ship's anchor and artifacts.

The proceeds of any sale of recovered artifacts will be shared with the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, which will get a quarter of the total amount.

The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands also has first choice of the artifacts.
 

Hey Tom, where did you get that? I don't believe one iota of your post!
 

IF they are guilty as charged, they should be banned from any other sites, both as a Corp. & as Individuals! They give all Salvagers a black eye!

HH Joe
 

That is amazing that anyone could get that ridiculously stupid, and greedy. Like you said that one blackeye is going to create a lot of issues for some time to come. What's pathetic is that its a US territory.
 

You know all you guys can't wait to bad mouth someone and claiming they may have a negative effect of the Reef and some fish that call this reef their home.
Here in Brevard County Florida there is STILL human waste being dumped into the Indian River. This happens in Titusville, Cocoa, Melboure every other day but there is not single person on this FORUM that is concerned but let someone in another part of the world kill off a few fish or causes damage to a reef and all hell breaks lose.
Peg Leg
 

Hey Peg Leg, when the govt. destroys the environment it's O.K. Read my comment on the NPS and NOAA thread. The FL DEP gave the permit for 500 million gallons of acid water to be dumped in the Gulf last year. That wiped out all life from Tarpon Springs to Boca Grand and they got away with it!
 

Remember when the U.S.S.R was called THE STATE?
Everything belonged to THE STATE.
Can anyone tell me the difference here.
The STATE (either one) claimed that everything belonged to the PEOPLE but the PEOPLE had NO rights and were not allowed to see what they OWNED. WHERE IS THE DIFFERENCE?
I don't see any.
Peg Leg
 

It looks like someone has done their homework.
YES I am the same Don Webb.
I am the same Don Webb that was shot in Sierra Leone.
I am the same Don Webb that killed 5 rebels at the MOA River near the Wendura Rapids.
I am the same Don Webb that provided Military advise to the Government of Sierra Leone.
I am the same Don Webb that had a $10,000.00 reward posted on his life by the RUF.

Now if you want to we can get into a serious talk about what happened in Sierra Leone.
let me know.
I really take offense to being called a LUNATIC.
But you may be right because if anyone on this forum has seen first hand what I witnessed it would drive some of you insane
I collected over 450 photos of Death and Destruction that was sent to the U.N Special Court and is part of their evidence in Proscution of those that COMMITTED THESE CRIMES.I was and still am against FEMALE CIRCUMSION.
I know that this is not the place for this type comment but maybe it will give you a better insight of who I am and what I am all about.
I will say no more.
Don Webb
 

They drove an Excavator on a reef??? Now those are some brilliant men aboard that ship. At least they had the foresight to lay down 73 tons of concrete blocks first . ::)

Don...I care about reefs, therefore I don't care about raw sewege being dumped into the ocean??? Sometimes your are WAAAAAY out there bro. I raised captive bred seahorses to release back into the wild because the Chinese seem to think they are natural viagra and damn near killed them all off. If you think i don't care about every aspect of our oceans, and our world for that matter, you are quite wrong. When we were hunting in Jupiter, I pee'd in my wetsuit...so I guess I can't really talk about human waste in the ocean though :( But for the record, if I saw you drive an excavator across a reef, you'd have another bullet hole :D

(moderators, that was NOT a threat to shoot Don....what would we do for entertainment around here if not for his posts.) ;)
 

Jason, so it was YOU who peed his wetsuit! I saw a minor fish kill down there and was getting ready to blame Gecy.

Yes, once again, Don missed the point of my last post. *sigh*
 

Sierra Leone doesn't look like a nice place to visit:


Major infectious diseases:
degree of risk: very high
food or waterborne diseases: bacterial and protozoal diarrhea, hepatitis A, and typhoid fever
vectorborne diseases: malaria and yellow fever are high risks in some locations
water contact disease: schistosomiasis
aerosolized dust or soil contact disease: Lassa fever (2005)

MichaelB
 

Hey the lot of you , stick Sierra get back to the subject , Don whats done is done, Michael few care and GDaddy good post, the latter, we are here to talk about the future not the past, later 99*
 

Wow, that one spiralled out of control fast... Funny to see how the conversation flows though isnt it. Hey Ive heard that the old boys used to use dynamite on the reefs when artifacts were encased in the coral. Also that they still use underwater jackhammers or pnuematic hammers to chip a reef apart to get at the artifacts encased in the same corals.
Now heres a question that gonna make everyone groan. What do we think is more important. The living reef, a valuable part of the ecosystem and very protected, or a priceless artifact that is most likely not only worth a lot of money, but also is a valuable part of our history and perhaps our heritage?? I dont know to be honest.

Do they still use invasive methods like jackhammers and stuff. I have to be completely honest, all morals aside. I have grown up enjoying the reefs and swimming around them and free diving on them and I really do love them, but if I knew there something ridiculously valuable inside a coral head, that head would probably be cracked open within ten minutes come hell or high water. I dont know, what do you guys think??

-theGOLD
 

Ah HA, but what if the Gold is beautiful?? ;D

Ha, no but I agree with you Cornelius. I guess its a toss up of what one finds more beautiful, the history... or the nature?!

Who knows, I guess we should strive for preserving both if possible

-theGOLD
 

Coral grows back. Yes, it grows slowly but it DOES grow back. You can't grow doubloons and they don't make 8 real coins anymore (exept the counterfiters).
 

I may open up a can of worms with this reply, but there are areas where the coral is dying at astounding rates. In the FKNMS you are not even allowed to touch the coral while diving. No resting in place or hanging on if there's a current, and especially no jackhammers or dynamite. The coral there grows slowly and I can understand the need for protection.

In some areas closer to the equator, the coral grows rapidly. My opinion, have at it, hammers, saws, etc. (within reason) Certainly don't want to take down a whole reef. But certaily excavate a reasonbale area for historic purposes. Burt webber did with the Concepcion.

Then you also have ancient dead coral reefs like the ones along the Vero/Sebastian area. These certainly can not be replaced but because the coral has not be growing for centuries, the artifacts are usually resting on top instead of encrusted within. So the need to excavate is minimal.

I am all for protecting our environment. Granted I am not a vocal activist but I do believe the actions we take today will greatly effect our future. I read an article recently that predicts there will be no Arctic summer ice by the year 2040. Very concerning!

I guess my point is, you have to weigh the options and do everything you can to protect the resources we have. I do not consider gold or silver coins to be a historically significant artifact that would warrant the mass destruction of a coral reef. We have a very good record of the coins that were minted and hundreds of thousands, even millions have been recovered, and we have learned most of what there is to learn about new world currency.

I guess I have successfully argued the Archaeologist point of view with regard to environmental destruction. But with that being said, I am all for the retrieval of coins and treasure everywhere else possible! Even if it means excavating an area or shipwreck. Archaeologist will argue that excavation is destructive and the wrecks will lie there forever if undisturbed. They no this is not true because they are now covering wrecks with sand and tarps in an effort to preserve them. The truth is, and they know it, is that for every year a wreck lies on the bottom of the ocean they lose valuable information about the wreck and the circumstances surrounding its wrecking.

Mother Nature is slowly eating away at our history and I feel its my job to do what I can to help preserve it.

Robert in SC
 

Good reply Robert...I might lean a little more towards the environmentalist side but I agree. I would seperate it into two categories, the ones who dilligintly try to do as little damage as possible, and only do real damage if a known significant artifact warrants it (this is not another 8 reale or dubloon). Then there are the types who drive excavators over reefs with no regard to the environmental impact they are causing...these are the ones who might blow up a reef because there were 40 more coins on the manifest that they hadn't found.

And to stick up for Art McKee and the other "dynamite hunters" from 50 years ago...keep in mind that in the 50's and 60's, they didn't have underwater pulse induction metal detectors, SSS, Magnetometers, and mailboxes. Nor did they know how long it took for a reef to grow, how delicate coral life forms actually are, or what type of impact they were having. If you study (or knew) Art, you'd know that his biggest concern was that the dynamite was killing fish around the blast zone...it bothered him that these fish had to die. So it is my opinion that if they had know then what we know now, they would have changed.

Until you've tried to keep corals alive in an aquarium, you don't get a full appreciation for just how delicate they are. Once you figure out how to keep them alive, you start to understand just how resilliant they are also. I'll stand by my original promise, if I see you needlessly destroying a reef...YOU will feel more pain than the reef. 8)
 

Ha, thats funny scubafinder, I used to do that too. I had four or five aquariums when I was young. I used to catch all sorts of totally illegal (I obviously didnt know it at the time, I just thought they were interesting looking) animals and keep them. Baby snook, baby stone crabs, lots of seahorses, baby Nassau Grouper. It was neat to see how everything interacted and how they used the reef. Cool stuff for sure.

I thin that I am on the same level as you scubafinder. Nature is important, history is also important. Have you guys ever seen the "Bullsh%t" episode on showtime about PETA? Oh man, I know the show is totally biased, but it was retty damn funnny, nonetheless...Some people are so crazy when it comes to a cause, like way beyond realistic and reasonable crazy...

Thanks for answering my question though, I wondered what people thought about that. Do you have to get special permits in most areas for invasive excavation??

-theGOLD
 

I'm a member of PETA - People who Eat Tasty Animals ;D

I know in Florida you have to do a Benthic survey...meaning you have to account for all animals that cannot move themselves quickly enough to get out of your way. If there are large colonies, you can not disturb them, and you have to lay out a plan to do your work without disturbing them. Not sure about other places though.

Jason
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top