thurmownator
Bronze Member
...........good to me.
as in Fed box of halves for the year #33.
It produced:
37p (that I didn't have yet !)
60d
61p (that I didn't have yet !)
64p
65x4
66x4
67x12
68dx6
69dx2
81 proof
05p
83p (gold plated w/ the "60 - 80" stamped on it).
for a terrific 35 keepers !
But wait, there's more. That was just the "front nine" of this 5x5x2 box.
The bottom half yielded:
59d
64px3
64dx2
65x3
66x11
67x5
68dx9
69dx2
05p
for an incredible 37 more keepers; a box total of 72 or a 7.2% keeper rate !! (on a Fed box no less)
Box #34 kept the "universal average" balanced, I guess, as it only produced three CuNi keepers (87 proof, 96 proof and an 02p)
Still, 75 keepers from two Fed boxes is tremendous.
as in Fed box of halves for the year #33.
It produced:
37p (that I didn't have yet !)
60d
61p (that I didn't have yet !)
64p
65x4
66x4
67x12
68dx6
69dx2
81 proof
05p
83p (gold plated w/ the "60 - 80" stamped on it).
for a terrific 35 keepers !
But wait, there's more. That was just the "front nine" of this 5x5x2 box.
The bottom half yielded:
59d
64px3
64dx2
65x3
66x11
67x5
68dx9
69dx2
05p
for an incredible 37 more keepers; a box total of 72 or a 7.2% keeper rate !! (on a Fed box no less)
Box #34 kept the "universal average" balanced, I guess, as it only produced three CuNi keepers (87 proof, 96 proof and an 02p)
Still, 75 keepers from two Fed boxes is tremendous.
Upvote
0