1st insitu pic. need some info.

musky44

Sr. Member
Jan 29, 2010
386
40
west viginia
i have taken several insitu pics with my phone, this is the first time i had my camera. what i was wondering about was the skinny black point. is that a thinning flake taken out of the bottom or could it be a wee little flute. i have nothing like it to compare to. probably just wishful thinkin. if anyone has any advice or even similar pics , i would appreciate it. thanks [attach5]
 

Attachments

  • SANY1117.JPG
    SANY1117.JPG
    155.2 KB · Views: 392
  • SANY1116.JPG
    SANY1116.JPG
    66.8 KB · Views: 386
  • SANY1114.JPG
    SANY1114.JPG
    35.6 KB · Views: 398
  • SANY1113.JPG
    SANY1113.JPG
    112.3 KB · Views: 422
  • SANY1119.JPG
    SANY1119.JPG
    75.9 KB · Views: 394
Upvote 0
Any grinding one the base? It doesn't look like it from the pictures but you can't always see everything in a picture. The Paleo Indians loved that black Coshocton Flint so it just might be a Late Paleo/Early Archaic type piece. It's a nice find either way.
 

Could you kindly post a picture of both sides. This way we can all get a look at its manufacture and give you a better clue..............So far that is looking like a flute, could be a thinning flute though. If you show both sides we all get a better look at the auricles and see if there is possible break or thinning and see if it is made that way................it is a nice find...................thanks .........................GTP
 

Musky,
Nice shot. Incredible piece. I usually don't have the patience or discipline to get the pic before the point!
Great work.
PG
 

Great find, and cool pictures.

If you look at your pictures you can see the ripples in the flake are angled a bit, which to me indicates that it was a thinning flake vs an intentional flute.

This picture kind of shows what I mean, the flake was taken from an angle vs a flute which is usually taken in the middle of the piece, strait up the axis of the biface.
 

Attachments

  • picture.JPG
    picture.JPG
    40 KB · Views: 608
thanks for all the kind words and help. here are some pics of the other side. [attach7]
 

Attachments

  • SANY1131.JPG
    SANY1131.JPG
    134 KB · Views: 598
  • SANY1136.JPG
    SANY1136.JPG
    110.6 KB · Views: 593
  • SANY1133.JPG
    SANY1133.JPG
    85.9 KB · Views: 578
  • SANY1134.JPG
    SANY1134.JPG
    99.8 KB · Views: 589
  • SANY1135.JPG
    SANY1135.JPG
    132.3 KB · Views: 575
  • SANY1130.JPG
    SANY1130.JPG
    107.9 KB · Views: 562
  • SANY1132.JPG
    SANY1132.JPG
    111.8 KB · Views: 565
A beauty and the thinning strike that went ouch gives it some history. Rare and nice.
Thanks for sharing sir.
 

Molly said:
Nobody knows what type it is then?

Molly.

Kind of hard to confidently put that piece into a specific type. Personally I'd call it a late paleo to early archaic knife or preform from just looking at a 2d picture, jmo. It's something you'd have to study in hand to give an honest appraisal I think.
 

Personally I think that flute channel is the result of an undesirable "stack" the maker wanted to jettison. You see these flutes all the time on early archaic pieces
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2974.jpg
    IMG_2974.jpg
    198.1 KB · Views: 471
Thanks for the info guys. Interesting. First time I have seen a fluted notched point.

Molly.
 

I was very curious about his blade. I asked a friend of mine that has been collecting & studying for many many years & he said It's basal thining not fluting. Ovate blade or preform.
Still a killer find Musky Congrats..

Molly.
 

My guess (FWIW) is that it's a re-base : the snapped-off blade section of a hafted point that was long enough to coax some further use out of by thinning the base enough to re-haft it. It's a strategy that goes back at least to Dalton times.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top