1941 s mercury dime

nsdq

Silver Member
Oct 16, 2011
4,032
1,930
Tarpon springs FL
Detector(s) used
AT-Pro,Ace 150, flea market digger
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • Picture 139.jpg
    Picture 139.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 369
  • Picture 145.jpg
    Picture 145.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 416
  • Picture 146.jpg
    Picture 146.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 413
  • Picture 143.jpg
    Picture 143.jpg
    17.7 KB · Views: 371
hope this helps ,,, apears to be in a high mint state
 

Attachments

  • Picture 153.jpg
    Picture 153.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 569
  • Picture 154.jpg
    Picture 154.jpg
    14.9 KB · Views: 563
  • Picture 155.jpg
    Picture 155.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 466
  • Picture 159.jpg
    Picture 159.jpg
    15.2 KB · Views: 463
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
 

I think it might have been cleaned. The wear on the details doesn't seem to match with the luster? I could be wrong. Can you get a pic that's more head on and closer of the mint mark?
 

capndan151 said:
I think it might have been cleaned. The wear on the details doesn't seem to match with the luster? I could be wrong. Can you get a pic that's more head on and closer of the mint mark?






not cleaned , no wear anywhere on it , very hard to get a good pic due light reflection,, has extremly sharp details , pics give it no justice
 

CoinHELP! said:
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
:icon_scratch: :help: not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me
 

nsdq said:
CoinHELP! said:
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
:icon_scratch: :help: not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me

The bands must be fully "split", and I can't see that for the middle band which is the area of concern.
 

CoinHELP! said:
nsdq said:
CoinHELP! said:
It's not full torch bands, but it looks uncirculated, and the mint mark looks large.
:icon_scratch: :help: not sure about the full bands , they look to be there to me

The bands must be fully "split", and I can't see that for the middle band which is the area of concern.
hope this helps can't get better pics coin is just that shiny
 

Attachments

  • Picture 167.jpg
    Picture 167.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 612
  • Picture 161.jpg
    Picture 161.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 606
  • Picture 180.jpg
    Picture 180.jpg
    15.3 KB · Views: 615
Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.
 

CoinHELP! said:
Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.
smart phone????? i use a old skool brickfor a cell , i was useing a web cam my good cam is broken
 

nsdq said:
CoinHELP! said:
Better, but still not good enough, however I can see line in the middle band now. Are you using a smart phone for the images? You might try a scan, if you have one.
smart phone????? i use a old skool brickfor a cell , i was useing a web cam my good cam is broken

LOL. About same quality though.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top