It can happen. It's still out there waiting to be rescued.

I'm not doubting that this is a real possibility....however I've never seen a coin that is sprayed with water bead up like this. Like instantly it starts beading up like a car would after having wax or a cleaner on it. Course I'm negative by nature so it is probably real and a awesome video.

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
 

13dolphins1 said:
I'm not doubting that this is a real possibility....however I've never seen a coin that is sprayed with water bead up like this. Like instantly it starts beading up like a car would after having wax or a cleaner on it. Course I'm negative by nature so it is probably real and a awesome video.

Sent from my SPH-L720T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

LMAO!!! Yeah and he was acting like his hand was shanking.....FRAUD!!! Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

That would be amazing. While I too can be a natural skeptic, I want to believe.
 

Probably wrapped in oil cloth - explains the water beading up.
 

Truth1253 said:
LMAO!!! Yeah and he was acting like his hand was shanking.....FRAUD!!! Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
That's controlled emotions, right hand shaking like crazy and the left is steady like a rock, lol.

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
 

I see nothing fake here. A shame some of you see fit to pick it apart.
 

looked real enough to me.

the appearance of Beading , may have been from what ever as in the spray.

.

My biggest problem was the patience at opening the cloth.

I would have turned the Jar upside down, Tapped it on the ground.
grabbed it out the cloth, Wiped the dirt of with My Thumb While saying WOW AWESOME !!!!!!
 

Last edited:
IMO Faker than fake. An 1830 coin in a 1930's jar in MINT CONDITION yet! Then when he pulls the cloth out, he doesn't look into the jar which tells me that he knew there was only one item in it. The video starts with the hole already open. There is an oil coating on the coin. After 85+ years the cloth would have been either deteriorated OR so hard it would be like stone. As well as other things I see.

This was buried recently either by them or someone else IN MY OPINION.
 

b3y0nd3r said:
IMO Faker than fake. An 1830 coin in a 1930's jar in MINT CONDITION yet! Then when he pulls the cloth out, he doesn't look into the jar which tells me that he knew there was only one item in it. The video starts with the hole already open. There is an oil coating on the coin. After 85+ years the cloth would have been either deteriorated OR so hard it would be like stone. As well as other things I see.

This was buried recently either by them or someone else IN MY OPINION.
Click to expand...
Yeah about the good cloth that didn't come out in crumbles when raked with a stick. Imho if someone treasured that coin so highly to bury/hide it years ago than why not seal it with the Zink lid that went with that jar that would have been so corroded to the jar to be a real s.o.b. to unscrew. Much more believable imo.

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
 

A little hint about what its about would have been nice, don't like clicking random links
 

You doubters crack me up. A real hoot at parties I'm sure. I'll be sure to let them know you think it's fake. Maybe they'll join this thread to set you straight.
 

GopherDaGold said:
You doubters crack me up. A real hoot at parties I'm sure. I'll be sure to let them know you think it's fake. Maybe they'll join this thread to set you straight.
Click to expand...

Easy to imagine that scenario:

"Oh my god, dude ! You mean you think we didn't legit find this, dude ?? Are you kidding me, dude ? Oh my god, dude !"
 

My first impression= Gotta be true, it's on the internet.:laughing7:
My second impression= Phony as a 7 dollar bill. Kid should be Keel Hauled.:skullflag: Then tar and feathered.:censored:
Marvin
 

I'd very much like to believe him! With that being said, I see things that just don't add up in my head....... 1. 1800s coin in a 1900s era jar. 2. The tree circumference appears around the size of my trees that are between 6 & 9 years old. The cloth just doesn't appear right. But that's just my experiences mostly doing building searches & finding tools etc. wrapped in "oil cloth" or old shop rags speaking. And then there's the points everyone has brought up. Near mint coin & the apparently oily surface. Just my thoughts from my experiences. Just for kicks try this! Take a jar, add some silty dirt like that. Fill the jar the rest of the way with water. Let it sit until the water evaporates and refill it again. Repeat three or four times. When it is completely dry try shaking & picking with a stick. Does it act the same? Bet it does! So the contents of that jar could've only been in the jar 2 - 3 weeks. These are my observations from my experiences, so I'd like to hear what others think. If you must, calling me an Alpha Henry will be permitted.
 

in Most cases I can imagine the cloth being in much worse condition.
However there is a possibility the Jar changed that.

I do agree 20th Century Jar.

I also believe they said He found another 1830's coin there earlier ?
But didn't say What.
I'm guessing Large cent if True, because he acted like it wasn't silver like this one was.

I still believe it is possible.
as far as Condition. I didn't see any good picks.and unless worn smooth,
Large old Silver can look mint, when you first lay eyes on it.
But after calming down & closer inspection you usually spot the wear and marks.

Maybe wishful thinking, But I hope it was a Legit find.
it Gives us all Hope.

the way the dirt clung to the Milk Glass looked legit to me.
it's hard to get fresh dirt to stick to milk glass unless wet & Lumped.

what I find odd most. No Blue Lid.
since it wasn't empty, Why No Blue Lid ?

and he said he hoped there as a Coin in it.

"A Coin"

I would have hoped for a cache of coins.
Just saying :happysmiley:
 

Last edited:
I'm new here, and don't know if I can for sure tell if the find is fake or true. I want to believe. but I also just read that there's rules on treasure net about claiming something is real or fake:

"1. It is NEVER appropriate or permissible, regardless of proof, to state or suggest in an open forum that another member's find may not be genuine— unless, of course, he has raised that possibility himself, or there is an obvious issue that cannot be disputed or ignored (for example, if the word "COPY" is clearly stamped on a coin).

2. It is NEVER appropriate or permissible to suggest that a member may not actually have found the item which he has posted as a find."

Is this a rule that is usually followed or no? I'm just trying to get a feel for the treasure net guidelines.
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

How much learning curve on the XP Deus?

⬅️ Previous Thread

Realistic depth of T2 Classic

Next Thread ➡️

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Simplex Metal Detector

Latest Discussions

Back
Top