Mining Claim Fee Maps

Clay Diggins

Silver Member
Nov 14, 2010
4,918
14,339
The Great Southwest
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
We've added a new mapping layer to the Land Matters Mining Claim Maps. You will find the new layer under the "Claims" mapping group on every mining claim map. It's named "Mining Claim Fees Paid". The mining claim maps start without the new layer displaying so you will need click the checkbox next to the layer name to begin using this map layer.

top.jpg


This new map layer shows the total amount of maintenance fees paid to the BLM for each Section since annual Maintenance fees were begun in 1993. These fee totals are for annual maintenance only and do not include filing or locating fees or the costs associated with State recording fees. Mining bonds and permit expenses are not included.

Each Section that has had claims during the period from 1979-2024 are represented in green on the map. The more fees that have been paid for the section the darker the green. Some sections may have $0 in fees paid yet show several claims. These are Sections where all claims were closed before the maintenance fees began in 1993.

As you zoom in the amount of fees paid will be displayed in the section. In this example the Fees Paid are displayed between the normal active mining claims display.

6b64ae86-9698-6531-fe45-7c71b67620e4.jpg


To get Information at any zoom level you can select the
9d80df93-ebc7-4336-8b93-6f299d0a34fd.png
information tool and click on your area of interest will return a window with the number of claims and the total of fees paid in that section.


As with all our mining claim maps the current or prior existence of mining claims does not mean that the area is now open to new mining claims.



What are annual maintenance fees?​

Until 1993 all Mining Claims were held by completing a minimum of $100 worth of development work per claim per year. This was known as the mining claim labor requirement. If you didn't perform work on your mining claim each year before 1993 they became invalid.

In 1993 Congress, at the request of the BLM, enabled claim owners to pay an annual fee of $100 instead of completing their annual claim development work. This brought in funds to the BLM to administer the program as well as relieving them of their responsibility to check existing mining claims for evidence of development work. No longer did the BLM need to do field work to administer mining claims.

Since 1993 the annual claim fees have risen to $165 per year for each Lode claim and $165 per 20 acres for each placer claim. Placer claim fees can be as much as $1,320 per claim.

Unlike other government programs the mining claim case administration system at the BLM is entirely supported by claim owner fees. These annual mining claim maintenance fees are paid directly to each BLM State office to offset the costs associated with administrating the mining claim case files. No public monies are used.

Here are the totals by State of mining claim fees paid for the years 1994 - 2023

  • Arizona $507,229,955
  • California $385,681,600
  • Colorado $380,865,975
  • Idaho $307,600,865
  • Montana. $224,791,660
  • Nevada $1,523,212,855
  • New Mexico $190,491,505
  • Oregon $99,909,290
  • South Dakota $107,769,290
  • Utah $556,540,015
  • Washington. $53,075,435
  • Wyoming $468,886,230

    Total $4,806,054,675
Nearly 5 Billion dollars have been spent by mining claim owners to support BLM mining claim administration.
The BLM is now collecting more than 83 million dollars in mining claim maintenance fees each year. :thumbsup:

Heavy Pans
 

Attachments

  • Fees1.png
    Fees1.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 13
Last edited:
Upvote 4

Jim in Idaho

Silver Member
Jul 21, 2012
3,326
4,725
Blackfoot, Idaho
Detector(s) used
White's GM2, GM3, DFX, Coinmaster, TDI-SL, GM24K, Falcon MD20, old Garrett Masterhunter BFO
'Way Too Cool' dual 18 Watt UV light
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
That, is what is known as a rip-off...LOL. Unless they're only targeting the big companies for claiming vast areas and sitting on them.
JIm
 

Assembler

Silver Member
May 10, 2017
3,210
1,279
Detector(s) used
Whites, Fisher, Garrett, and Falcon.
Primary Interest:
Prospecting
That, is what is known as a rip-off...LOL. Unless they're only targeting the big companies for claiming vast areas and sitting on them.
JIm
This sounds like a reference to administer managing "Case files" that fees are paid for and no management of annual work or development work of any given "Claim".

Many States make a reference to State laws that must be complied with and some states go so far as to state that if the essentials of discovery and location are not complied with, the claim shall be null and void.

Act of May 10, 1872(17Stat.91;30U.S.C. Ch. 2; Title 43 C.F.R.): This Act contains the General Mining Laws which, with amendments, are still in force today. It provides in detail for discovery, location, survey and patent of both lode and placer claims; also mill sites. It requires annual labor, or assessment work until patent.

Act of February 27, 1865, Sec. 9 (13 Stat. 441): Recognized that the public domain was being appropriated for mining purposes but that such appropriation was by the law of possession and that the paramount title to such lands lay in the United States.

Question what is a "Case file"?
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Top