ivan salis
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2007
- 16,794
- 3,811
- 🏆 Honorable Mentions:
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- delta 4000 / ace 250 - used BH and many others too
Yep was looking a group of folks website that I actully like and respect---then I saw it not one but two "classical" type screw ups-----both of the not thinking things out properly or careless type aviodible errors---hate those type errors---
the first was a report by a well know person and respected person---who translated a item from old spanish documents---- wreckage found on the north coast of st augustine...a "straight translation'' ...spanish to english ..well normally that would be fine "but''...they forgot that the spanish "speak" differantly than english speakers so its not '''north coast" of st augustine---- its really--- on the coast north of st augustine **about a 40 mile differance***to the actual or "correct" spot------they should have corrected for it or explained the differance.
the 2nd error was a spanish report that stated 15 leauges to the leeward---the guy says (50 miles) hah ---were did he look up his facts? ---the spanish leauge was 2.6 miles or roughly 2 2/3 miles ---take the 15 leauges X 2 2/3 miles guess what 40 miles bingo!!!---a 10 mile differance or 20% off had to be converting at 3 1/3 to 1 league---where that came from who knows ---the english used 3 --the spanish 2.6 or roughly 2 2/3.
they did list "fact" right--- an english report from virgina govenor to the british sec in england that stated " a large quanity of plate is likewise was cast away about 40 miles to the northward of st augustine".---I tracked that one down in the british national archives---I am currently getting a "private" copy of it made so that I can see for myself to recheck the facts ---thats what I do find out for sure.----make sure of your facts and check your sources before speading lots of time or money looking in the wrong places----chasing "ghost"
plus theres a 1769 map showing a wreck site right at just about 40 miles from st augustine to the tee---humm
can't wait for the state arch diver to show in two months ---and say yep you sure did your research. Ivan
the first was a report by a well know person and respected person---who translated a item from old spanish documents---- wreckage found on the north coast of st augustine...a "straight translation'' ...spanish to english ..well normally that would be fine "but''...they forgot that the spanish "speak" differantly than english speakers so its not '''north coast" of st augustine---- its really--- on the coast north of st augustine **about a 40 mile differance***to the actual or "correct" spot------they should have corrected for it or explained the differance.
the 2nd error was a spanish report that stated 15 leauges to the leeward---the guy says (50 miles) hah ---were did he look up his facts? ---the spanish leauge was 2.6 miles or roughly 2 2/3 miles ---take the 15 leauges X 2 2/3 miles guess what 40 miles bingo!!!---a 10 mile differance or 20% off had to be converting at 3 1/3 to 1 league---where that came from who knows ---the english used 3 --the spanish 2.6 or roughly 2 2/3.
they did list "fact" right--- an english report from virgina govenor to the british sec in england that stated " a large quanity of plate is likewise was cast away about 40 miles to the northward of st augustine".---I tracked that one down in the british national archives---I am currently getting a "private" copy of it made so that I can see for myself to recheck the facts ---thats what I do find out for sure.----make sure of your facts and check your sources before speading lots of time or money looking in the wrong places----chasing "ghost"
plus theres a 1769 map showing a wreck site right at just about 40 miles from st augustine to the tee---humm
can't wait for the state arch diver to show in two months ---and say yep you sure did your research. Ivan