diggemall
Hero Member
Since I have started "lurking" on T-Net, I have seen a few references to the idea that older coins are hard to find because they sink over time. However, I have also read just as many references to finding old coins within a few inches of the surface. I can't quite wrap my head around this whole thing.
I'm in black soil farm country up here in Wisconsin. Every other year or so most of the farmers pull a wagon back and forth over their fields while their kids pick stones. Now, these fields have been worked since the 1880's, and the mold-board type plows used around here only turn over the top 8 or so inches of soil. If dense objects "sink" in soil, why is it that they seem to have a perpetual supply of new stones to pick up ?
In these same conditions, in the spring, when the soil is so saturated you can sink well past your ankles, stones on the surface just stay there.
It seems, at least in the northern climates that, if anything, the yearly frost helps to work objects UP towards the surface, providing that steady supply of stones. (Around here frost routinely reaches 3 feet and can go as deep as 6 feet)
In turf conditions, I can see objects "sinking" as topsoil builds above them rather quickly with continual mowing and the like, and decomposing thatch (maybe at the rate of a quarter inch every ten or so years)
Likewise, in extremely wet mud, I can see objects sinking over time, but there aren't really that many areas that are that wet for more than a couple days each year that would also bear any kind of public use (i.e. not too many people picnic, or build a house right in a swamp)
I have found a couple objects that seem to support the sinking theory (like a pipe wrench down 18 inches or so) but they could also be explained by fill having been brought in.
I'd like to hear everybodys opinions on this one, and whatever evidence they have to back those opinions up......
Diggem'
I'm in black soil farm country up here in Wisconsin. Every other year or so most of the farmers pull a wagon back and forth over their fields while their kids pick stones. Now, these fields have been worked since the 1880's, and the mold-board type plows used around here only turn over the top 8 or so inches of soil. If dense objects "sink" in soil, why is it that they seem to have a perpetual supply of new stones to pick up ?
In these same conditions, in the spring, when the soil is so saturated you can sink well past your ankles, stones on the surface just stay there.
It seems, at least in the northern climates that, if anything, the yearly frost helps to work objects UP towards the surface, providing that steady supply of stones. (Around here frost routinely reaches 3 feet and can go as deep as 6 feet)
In turf conditions, I can see objects "sinking" as topsoil builds above them rather quickly with continual mowing and the like, and decomposing thatch (maybe at the rate of a quarter inch every ten or so years)
Likewise, in extremely wet mud, I can see objects sinking over time, but there aren't really that many areas that are that wet for more than a couple days each year that would also bear any kind of public use (i.e. not too many people picnic, or build a house right in a swamp)
I have found a couple objects that seem to support the sinking theory (like a pipe wrench down 18 inches or so) but they could also be explained by fill having been brought in.
I'd like to hear everybodys opinions on this one, and whatever evidence they have to back those opinions up......
Diggem'
Upvote
0