Idahodutch
Bronze Member
Hello Jeff,First, that is what Bicknel wrote and not the first person or second person as to what Waltz said to be commonly believed to be accurate, but not guaranteed. Waltz says high peaks to the south, and really as far as Butte it was not in the Mexacans vernacular, so Bieknel who is regarded as not being accurate and also getting information d
from Julia Thomas who was thankfully a total incompetent( otherwise the mine may have been found). to add to this our editor is an English - Spanish professor who said that mid-nineteenth Mexicans would not have used the word, Butte. and technically it is not butte. however, Waltz's doodle is.
Seems I struck a nerve or something.
You were responding to Ancientones, I believe, about his use of names …. Associated with the 5 mile diameter clue….. and also a peak to the south.
The clues we have are the clues we have 🤪
You don’t need to attempt to trash folk, just cause what they wrote, or said, doesn’t fit your spot. So why do it?
You seemed to have come across a whole slew of clues , previously worded in a way that is unknown to most of us.
I have to ask you a serious question.
Did you find a list of clues, worded in a way that just happened to be matching up to your spot, or did you just simply change the wording to make it look like you were actually on to something, associated with the LDM?
If I’m all out of whack here, then please tell me how things really are.
Sincerely,
Idahodutch
Amazon Forum Fav 👍
Last edited: